adoyal
21 points
23:10 can you explain a bit more about what you mean just before you overbet, when you say you can because your EV is really high?
Nov. 22, 2019 | 6:35 p.m.
woops
Nov. 20, 2019 | 10:01 p.m.
17:47 when you have T8o and you fold the turn saying you fold having the 8 and also no diamond... wouldnt having a diamond be a bad thing because you are blocking some of his bluffing range?
Nov. 20, 2019 | 8:58 p.m.
18:34 AJQhhd are you saying a common strategy is to bet small at a high frequency, or to over bet and play a 2 street hand.. how about like pot/block/check? or is better to simplify to using one of the two strats?
Nov. 20, 2019 | 5:23 p.m.
yeah future thinking defo helps mistake tilt
Nov. 18, 2019 | 1:17 p.m.
Is this pio edge? I could never run anythin preflop needed way too much ram?
Nov. 17, 2019 | 10:30 a.m.
Can you suggest videos for habits, routine and mental game?
Nov. 17, 2019 | 9:32 a.m.
Antonio Miranda Nice I never even considered equity vs pocket pairs. Thanks for your response
Nov. 5, 2019 | 1:49 p.m.
"13.14" on the A949 board why am I seeing high freq bluffs with all combos of JQs JTs and QTs and it is also bluffing these same hands on A94A ott, is this because we are blocking Q9, J9, T9, AJ, AT and AQ? Are these hands giving up on the river? Also why not bluff KQ on A94A blocking AK and AQ or is this bad because we have showdown value with K high and villain is 4betting AK and sometimes AQ?
Nov. 5, 2019 | 8:32 a.m.
still going?
Sept. 26, 2019 | 10:50 p.m.
Question is the title, what win rates do you think are achievable at 50nl zoom hu on stars, lets say what win rate an average winning player can expect, and also a crushing win rate
June 20, 2019 | 11:41 p.m.
Yeah would love to see more exploit videos i feel the same way, yeah pio videos can be interesting but it feels like the sole content these days and its yawn
June 11, 2019 | 5:03 p.m.
Was goin over hands with a solver with someone and we was lookin at say T52 vs Q52 and he was saying that Q is better for oop as they flop more top pairs so solver likes 1/3rd, and on T52 IP flops more top pairs so solver favours 1/2 pot.
i cant get my head around this logic of betting more because OOP has "nothin"?? (or more specifically less then IP)
March 27, 2019 | 2:09 a.m.
March 2, 2019 | 9:38 p.m.
Hi there
I play mostly 50nl HU and im looking for a coach that specialises in HU.
Failing that anyone want to talk an discuss hands strictly HU play
Let me know
Thanks
March 2, 2019 | 9:38 p.m.
My only advice would pay a lot of attention to showdowns and by this you can make assumptions on what their stats would be, i.e if he has got to showdown with bottom pair most likely low fold to cbet etc
Feb. 28, 2019 | 2:18 a.m.
any one have any experience dealing with "rakemeback"?
Feb. 3, 2019 | 9:37 p.m.
I understand the rakeback I get is X% of RPV and RPV is: RPV = (50% of SBR) + (50% of OLD RAKE). Yet I would like to know why the "Old rake" is way way under hm2? Over 1k dollars? Surely thats not right??
One link is my Hm2 database and another is pokerbills website used to show ipoker rake tracking. The final picture shows my rakeback tracker and what i am due
https://gyazo.com/3ced5fb4ff323a6012eb6e5b3c1bb60f
https://gyazo.com/bb7e050c6ba6fd6d704077546641364a
https://gyazo.com/5ac13951fdb80ee5e7161474a5bde331
Should I leave the current deal Im on and move to old rake method on betfair? Or is it the likely to calculate the contributed rake incorrectly as well? I understand these high % rakeback deals u get off RPV calculated methods is just pretty much sneaky marketing but i thought it would be similar or more then betfair considering i get 65%. Yet using my rake from my hm2, Im only getting 27% flat rakeback? Now im faced with do i switch to betfair and opt for 35% flat rakeback (I have even been offered 37.5%), or is betfair goin to incorrectly calculate the "old rake method" as well like it has here at the site i play on? Can anyone help me out?
Feb. 1, 2019 | 4:27 p.m.
I understand the rakeback I get is X% of RPV and RPV is: RPV = (50% of SBR) + (50% of OLD RAKE). Yet I would like to know why the "Old rake" is way way under hm2? Over 1k dollars? Surely thats not right??
One link is my Hm2 database and another is pokerbills website used to show ipoker rake tracking. The final picture shows my rakeback tracker and what i am due
https://gyazo.com/3ced5fb4ff323a6012eb6e5b3c1bb60f
https://gyazo.com/bb7e050c6ba6fd6d704077546641364a
https://gyazo.com/5ac13951fdb80ee5e7161474a5bde331
Should I leave the current deal Im on and move to old rake method on betfair? Or is it the likely to calculate the contributed rake incorrectly as well? I understand these high % rakeback deals u get off RPV calculated methods is just pretty much sneaky marketing but i thought it would be similar or more then betfair considering i get 65%. Yet using my rake from my hm2, Im only getting 27% flat rakeback? Now im faced with do i switch to betfair and opt for 35% flat rakeback (I have even been offered 37.5%), or is betfair goin to incorrectly calculate the "old rake method" as well like it has here at the site i play on? Can anyone help me out?
Feb. 1, 2019 | 8:12 a.m.
32:50 why not cbet AJ?
Jan. 30, 2019 | 5:53 p.m.
Like i said guys "The main reason i check raised, is because it was first hand with bumhuntin reg whose table im trying to steal, and he will be just tryin to steal a blind and sit me out".
The question is only about the turn,
GaliZianBoy thanks for youre response, its just J gives us more equity n 10x n <99 may fold to the second barrel
Jan. 22, 2019 | 3:12 p.m.
Like i said its the weakest of our range we may wanna continue you with, so weak that it works ok as a bluff raise, however the question is only about the turn and which cards we are continuing on, 8? hearts? j?
Jan. 22, 2019 | 4:04 a.m.
Its min raised preflop and this combo does have equity? Gutshot straight draw?
Jan. 21, 2019 | 4:21 a.m.
Hand History for Game 1111111111 (IPoker)
€50.00 EUR NL Texas Hold'em - Monday, January 21, 01:35:33 ET 2019
Table Barleben (Real Money)
Seat 3 is the button
Seat 3: Player3 ( €50.00 EUR ) - VPIP: 88, PFR: 56, 3B: 0, AF: 2.7, Hands: 16
Seat 8: Hero ( €50.00 EUR ) - VPIP: 63, PFR: 49, 3B: 12, AF: 3.4, Hands: 12169
Player3 posts small blind [€0.25 EUR].
Hero posts big blind [€0.50 EUR].
* Dealing down cards *
Dealt to Hero [ 9d 7c ]
Player3 raises [€0.75 EUR]
Hero calls [€0.50 EUR]
* Dealing Flop * [ 6c, Qh, Th ]
Hero checks
Player3 bets [€1.00 EUR]
Hero raises [€3.00 EUR]
Player3 folds
Hero wins €2.00 EUR from main pot
Hero wins €3.80 EUR from main pot
I know that's prob not the best board to x/r on cos its pretty wet and a lot of hands he will continue with. The main reason i did it, is because it was first hand with bumhuntin reg whose table im trying to steal, and he will be just tryin to steal a blind and sit me out,
This and 78 must be the bottom of our range that we want to continue with, both of which have reverse implied odds when we hit our nuts which maybe for this reason should never be a check raise? As well as the fact our straight could get outdrawn however back to the turn bluff continuing range which is why im writing this post, say he calls what turn cards are you continuing on? all 8s and maybe hearts? or just giving up on a non 8 turn?
Jan. 21, 2019 | 1:48 a.m.
You think hes donking all aces, 2 pairs and sets? What was his donk bet %?
Jan. 16, 2019 | 2:04 a.m.
yes exactly its called a donk bet not a raise so you think he's donk betting two pair?
Q 9 Jr board you said you either use range bet or mix overbet/check strat... and that usually on Q high boards you can get away with range betting with little loss in EV however on this board Q9J the EV loss is quite large and you should use a mix overbet/check strat? (am i understanding that right) and also you say this is because we are interested in having a checking range ... how does the EV differ from; Overbet/check, 66%/check and 33%/check etc on these boards?
March 9, 2020 | 6:14 p.m.