Wolfske

Villain needs to call 1 to win 2. So villain needs to win 1/3 of the time. If we have 2/3 value (wich mostly will win) and have 1/3 bluffs villain can only win 1/3 times by calling with bluffcatchers.

In our case we win 2/3 of the time = BE, but we will also get some bluffs through. So when the opponent doesn't play optimal we make profit in the hand.

But theory =/= practice. If our opponent overfolds flop cbets and has a range on the river that will call every time you just don't bluff (to give an easy example)

21:24 you 3bet, wich I understand. But do you think it's a good option to flat because of the other fish in the BB ? We can even call a squeeze of the BTN and play a nice pot ?

Hi Djunkell,

Awesome video, as a belgian it's hard to be a fan of a person from the Netherlands but you managed to pull it off .. (joke obv, hup Holland hup hehe)

What I was wondering:
How much does GTO matter on microstakes. I'm starting again from a break I now switched to zoom as I don't have time to play MTT's. Is it correct to asume it's pretty good to start to learn it already ? I think it benefits every game right ? Or should guys like me focus on something else?

Thanks in advance and really nice video btw

+1 It would be cool to have an essential video series to poker fundamentals. Most theory is assuming we already have this. But it's pbb not really easy to make.

I think a sort of 'pareto princple' in poker would be cool. The 20% most important stuff that makes up most of your results.