UidautFiar

vs MP open i fold this combo, can call with this combo with A suited

U need at least 31% equity (assumed that also the BB always call the allin), and also in the worst scenario (one opponents have straight, and the other for example QJ+FD)u have 34% equity, so the call is correct

try some simulation with PPT on the site ;) have idea about hands equity is very important ;)

I know that is "very exploitable", but no poblem about exploitaion in "3betted pot multiway OOP" situation

mmmmm nice question...yes thir result sould have rake already in them....

fold>3bet>call ,never think about call ;)

I mean on any flop , if i have only AA without FD or SD for example, multiway i easily check fold expecialy if i'm OOP

Preflop i think that with every SS aces the 3bet is ok!
But postflop i NEVER win a pot (especialy multiway) with only aces.
So when u 3bet aces, and have only overpari on the flop, i think is a super easy check fold, next hand and gg

U are from SB right? General, my SB play is more tight than BB play.
I never squeeze this combo from SB, and never squeeze from BB (from BB is a super easy call). From SB the problem is when happen what happen to you: the bb squeeze, and we have to play a big pot, OOP with a J suited hand (ok, with nice connection).
So my personal play from SB for this combo depend of BB: if BB is a passive fish, i can easy call; if i know that BB can squeeze a lot, i easy fold (repeat, playing tight from SB is a nice idea)

I think that this combo is rly loose for a 3bet....ok add rundowns obv to 3betting range, ok add 1 middle or low gap rundowns, but before add 2 gap rundown u sure have more bettere combo to 3bet

Ev BB/100 is rly similar to bb/100, the ev bb/100 is 21.
I analize the situation and:
RFI from BTN, i win 87evbb/100 (too low i think);
cold call from BTN i win 3evb/100;
cold call from BTN vs CO i win 41bb/100;
when i 3bet from BTN i have 210bb/100;
when i flat 3bet from BTN obv i loose but only 27bb/100

I think that the result are rly influenced by the small sample...

i also prefer the "bet line" instead of the passive line, cause some opponents sometimes can check with QQ/KK/JJ, so we have to put them under pressure with our bet to take max value

Why u prefer flatting pre this nice kings?

Sorry but, if u not 3bet AAxxss againt a "fish" 90x, which tipe of hands u use for 3betting this type of player?
U agree with me that we want to 3bet a lot against fish, to play as much HU pot as possibe, and to force them o put more money on the pot with their weak ranges right?

On this type of board is a super easy check fold (obv i want to put all money in any flop that give me NFD). We are playing against a 90x, not sure a reg but probably a fish/recreational player. I absolutely want to put much money as possible with my top range againts this type of player. On all baby board i see recreational overplay hands like QQ, KK and so one.
So super easy give up on any coordinate board (repeat, without FD), and super easy bet-jam on every board like this in this hand imo.
We are building a big pot, OOP BUT against a fish with a range advantage preflop, so i not see to problem to 3bet this aces

I thinkt that is a call every time with NFD+GS+OP, cause UTG range is "draw heavy", but i want to listen other opinion about this spot cause i'm a bit confused like you xD

i absolutely disagree. I can understand not 3bet the rainbow Aces in some situation, but non 3bet suited Aces i think is nosense.......how much u 3bet if not 3bet every single suited aces?

U bet the wrong size on flop. Opponents is 90x, and u can play this hand on 2 street;
i do more flop (something like 19/20) so oppo have 59/58 on 62/63 pot, and easy push on turn

You are 240x, so i think that u can call turn pot bet obv cause u have ur outs for the full, and also cause the opponest, after ur check, could try to steal with some flushes or maybe is overplaying two pair. So i think call turn, and always fold river against another bet

vs 50x effective stack i think that i push with KKxxss. I fold KK rainbow

Re-raise all-in on the flop is pretty std for me (we have TP, NFD on our 3betted pot IP, BvB against an agro player ;)

U need something like 33% equity, and against A4* and 46* combos u have 34% equity (if oppo have some low flush hour equity drop to 30%).
Like blablubb saied, i prefer small size turn (something like 13.8 is good), but more important fold pre imho from UTG.

I don't like the "paired A high combo" to coldcall a 3bet. The 3bettor range is rly A heavy, in this situation imho is much better flat the rundowns (better if not A high) or something like 9TTJ, TJJQ ecc

i thinkt that at micro-low stakes, rly few opponents have elastic range that change with our 3bet-4bet size. So, no sense to 4bet small with our top range imho

why only call and play a 3-4way pot? is much better 3bet, isolate the OR and playing this hands HU, IP against a big wale! The plan postflop is rly simple: we can bet any flop that we hit (essentialy two pair+ and wrap flop) and aslo try to do one and done on Axx flop (opponents too much time think that we have AAxx when we 3bet at this stake). IMO this combo is in our 3betting range from any position