This_Passing

i'm not sure I agree with this. yea he won't be 3betting rundowns as much but he's more inclined now to 3bet a bit wider for value with hands that don't play as well in a 100bb pot like some QQ/JJ/ATT, weaker kings, etc. so i'm not sure that his range is all of a sudden more weighted towards aces than before

as played facing the 3bet this is a pretty standard 4bet for me. not a fan of calling

agree with not 3betting pre, hand just isn't quite strong enough vs. UTG + caller

watching the newest videos, going through your database of hands, studying hands yourself with PJ/PPT/OR/other software, and having a coach are prob the best ways to get better at PLO

not a fan of leading this flop

how are you playing your full houses? do you have a x/r range? how would this fit into either of those ranges? it seems strong enough to x/c but if you have enough x/c hands then perhaps this would make a good bluff hand

you can write 10%10h, 10%6h and 10%3h, so default should be HU for 10%, so that's strange that it's giving you that problem. i also wrote in 90%!60% and it looks like it gives the 10h iterative as the average hand rank range is from 61-90, while the VR rank has best hand at 15%. hopefully someone else can chime in, otherwise you'll probably have to make some custom ranges

wp

no not when you've put in that much at 100bb. also at 2plo (and at other low stakes for that matter) I wouldn't underestimate the number of times that they are just gambling here, even if they are regs

call and show turn

Is this from PokerJuice or something different?

Look for spots where you have a range advantage, then go from there.

yes

fold pre. your flush draws are worthless, you don't have position, you have 9 high, and you're not closing the action

this call is bleeding money if you fold a blank turn like this. if you're only x/cing again on a non-club T,Q,A then you need to x/f flop. as played i think i'd call again since we don't block clubs or a lot of the str8 draws

not sure i understand your post albin. you mean if hero checks and villain bets?

hand is played perfect imo. your hand is too valuable on future streets to just x/f flop

pre-flop is pretty debatable tho given reads on villain. a not-so-nutty hand for us + villain plays a lot of hands pre + doesn't fold much post = hard to win this hand. you got a pretty favorable scenario this time

100% of the time unless u want to be insanely exploitable. if there was any chance of us making villain fold one of those flushes then river is an easy jam in our spot

Agree with betting flop smaller to set up future streets vs. a wider range.

I'm leaning towards betting the river because of how few As blockers are going to be in our betting range if we're checking the one that have some SD value. Also, we're in a pretty difficult spot if we face a bet since he can freely bet almost all of his flushes for value and our As blocker is hardly relevant in that scenario.

Not a fan of 3betting pre-flop.

River I think you'll get more value with x/c than by betting

am really happy getting this in. his pre-flop 3bet % will discount some AA combos, and his flop actions + your cards will discount even more combos (how many bare AA would he just pot/call the flop with? would need 2pr or a straight draw to go with it, both of which u block)

shipping here expecting to see 98+draw/88/22 or A9/A8/AQJT+hearts way more often than AA. it's a legit cooler if he has AA here given how hard it is for him to get here with it with his line + all the other hands he could have