Surrak's avatar

Surrak

6 points

Comment | Surrak commented on Specifically Poker

Resolve that's interesting. The thing that stands out the most as from ours graphs compared to everyone else is that we seem to be doing a fair bit worse in the red line? Perhaps we are playing too passively because we are and lack initiative? What do your aggression stats look like in this position?

I have 39% W$WSF, 20% aggression overall, 13/27/27% aggression on flop, turn river. So it seems like I play way too passively on the flop.

My fold to cbet is 47% in this spot, raise cbet is 9%. Also weirdly my check fold river is 68% which seems ridic high. So it certainly seems like I am letting myself get ran over in this situation.

April 21, 2017 | 11:58 p.m.

Comment | Surrak commented on Specifically Poker

Here's mine:

April 21, 2017 | 7:20 a.m.

Comment | Surrak commented on Specifically Poker

We win a pot of less than 4bbs every time we raise and everyone folds right?

April 20, 2017 | 8:07 a.m.

Comment | Surrak commented on Specifically Poker

Oh whoah that's really interesting, thank you!

April 20, 2017 | 12:44 a.m.

Thanks for the comments makes a lot of sense. The only question I have is it ok to start labelling someone as tight over such a small sample? I have always tried to refrain from reading too much into stats over small samples like this unless it is a very strong trend.

April 19, 2017 | 8:29 p.m.

Comment | Surrak commented on Specifically Poker

Thanks for the comments. Yes I have not really looked at it before but was quite shocked at the results it certainly seems like I am doing something very wrong. Should we not have any cold calling range from the SB vs any positions? I thought it was only vs CO/BTN we should never be cold calling, I don't cold call vs those positions. I am doing very badly from all positions when I cold call so I guess I may be calling with wrong hands and/or just playing very badly postflop when I don't have initiative.

April 19, 2017 | 8:25 p.m.

Comment | Surrak commented on Specifically Poker

Oh I just realised I forgot to filter for between 1.5 and 4bbs on the cold call graph. So that's my overall cold call results am I getting rekt. Is this normal because we mostly cold call from big blind or is that really bad?

Anyway here is cold call and won or lost between 1.5 and 4 bbs.

Sorry for slight thread hijack btw.

April 19, 2017 | 7:44 p.m.

Hand History | Surrak posted in NLHE: 5NL AJ 3Bet Pot Bluff River?
Blinds: $0.02/$0.05 (6 Players) BN: $5.75 (Hero)
SB: $2.49
BB: $16.34
UTG: $13.08
MP: $5.16
CO: $5.65
Villain is 18/13 over 31 hands.
Preflop ($0.07) Hero is BN with A J
UTG folds, MP raises to $0.15, CO folds, Hero raises to $0.45, 2 folds, MP calls $0.30
Not sure what to with AJo here. I think it's a bit too weak to flat. Blinds were nits with really low 3b stats if that makes it more of a flat?
Flop ($0.97) 2 T 3
MP checks, Hero bets $0.28, MP calls $0.28
Standard spot to bet 1/3 pot with whole range?
Turn ($1.53) 2 T 3 3
MP checks, Hero checks
See no reason to bet here?
River ($1.53) 2 T 3 3 9
MP checks
Should we bet here? We don't block any of his fd's and have blocker to JJ/AT how relevant is that? We can potentially fold out hands like AK/AQ/77/88.

April 19, 2017 | 7:35 p.m.

Comment | Surrak commented on Specifically Poker

Here you go. PFR:

Cold Caller:

This is like really bad right?

April 19, 2017 | 7:26 p.m.

Comment | Surrak commented on Specifically Poker

Thanks for the comments. Fold to 3 bet is 64% I know this is too high I've been working on it lately. Fold to cbet is 49% overall is that high?

Here's my results when defending BB vs SB.

I have no idea how to interpret stats from the BB as I understanding we should generally be losing in BB and in many spots our goal is just to lose less than when we fold?

April 19, 2017 | 7 p.m.

Comment | Surrak commented on Specifically Poker

Hey Nick, I just watched your last video on youtube. I was following along in my own database while watching and was quite shocked to notice that the student in the video is a decent winner when filtering for "player won or lose between 1.5 and 4bbs" but I am just getting destroyed when I filtered for that in my own database:

Is this a huge leak? What do you think would be causing this? Thanks.

April 19, 2017 | 12:55 a.m.

Comment | Surrak commented on 10NL Zoom Stats/Graph

Thanks for the advice guys.

March 28, 2017 | 6:33 a.m.

Post | Surrak posted in NLHE: 10NL Zoom Stats/Graph

Hey guys, I would really appreciate it if anyone could take a look at my graph stats. I just recently played ~50k hands of 10nl zoom and despite being a comfortable winner at 5nl I am barely BE. I realise this is not a particularly big sample size but just wondering if there are any stats that stand out and particularly wondering if I should be worried about my red line? It seems like a huge leak to me but everyone says your redline doesn't matter at these stakes so I'm not free. Tell me if there are any more stats that would be helpful Thanks!


March 26, 2017 | 6:36 a.m.

Load more
Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy