Smokedtruth

@Phil Is there anyway to become a small investor on the site? I believe it should be open to investments from the same poker players that run the games, given that investors would also have a financial interest on the games profitability. The lure of decentralized poker is that of a poker site owned by the poker people in behalf of the poker people themselves

Quido I also like the casual cash games in Party but I think they segregate player pool too much and make regular cash games tougher to make a living from. Its probably good that only one site has them if the others want to cater cash games regs as well

@Cheec @Phil Regarding Cheec suggestions. I write as a sng(mianly but play other stuff) winning reg here:

1. I always disliked that aspects of cash games and one of the reasons I dont grind them. Im motivated by being able to outskill opponents with expertise and strategy rationalization, these two get obscured if the wins are machine assited which is close to neccesary to be able to beat decent stakes cash games.

I take pride of being a winning reg without fancy tools, I dont use a Hud much less solver things. Id like poker to represent a game where the most skilled natural player wins in he long run, not the most fiddle.

However I have never heard of sites that can apply these policies very effectively so I didnt suggest it myself.

1. I agree with new game mods but strongly disagree with changing the nature of the game. At the end of the day poker is what we want to play, not some childish power up nonsense

   A bigger game tree is always nicer as time goes by and the games get more solved. Besides, some game types target different things, and a lot of them can be good. I.e I used to hate spins as thought it destructed other games soft liquidity(probably does), but now I like them as I see so much value from them at attracting mobile players that otherwise would just not play. Hell I wouldnt have played today as I was on the streets if it wasnt for spins, cant grind my 9 man sngs wih 10 minutes free time :/

Spins also bring another hot topic which is the thesis I presented at the 2plus2 thread that in the grand scheme of things grinders somewhat have to choose between a low variance declining income, or a higher variance(to entertain recs) sustainble higher income.

Anyways im really hapoy with your replies Phil :) so rare to see so much engagement from an operator with the community :,) it also seems that you are focused on make the best site ever, flat out, with secondary focus on the business side of things, which is trully remarkable. Hope you continue close to us man. Lol sorry for the long post, I feel as If I have a lot of ideas in need to share.

Hey Phil just one more question I can think of for now. Will you have an association with something like boom replayer so hands are more easily shared online? Thats a huge amount of free exposure

Thanks for the last answer.

Now, will you be able to play on your own site? Seems important to me as to keep the interest of being a player friendly room above all.

Will multitabling be limited? We all agree in the 2 plus 2 thread that this would be ideal, as it makes it harder to become a reg infested site.