Seiznem
4 points
yeah fair enough, i did a bit of research and i found microgaming had the lowest plo rake out there by far at 10c/20c with slightly better rake at 25c/50c. with 30% rakeback not too hard to achieve on their site i think that is the best option.
Nov. 15, 2016 | 7:46 p.m.
i like the lower variance route, especially without much fold equity, you're much better off pealing try to hit your hand and allow them to make major mistakes when they're drawing dead since there is just so much implied odds in this spot by the look of it.
Nov. 15, 2016 | 9:16 a.m.
Hello over the past few months i have transitioned from NLH cash to PLO. I have been playing 10c/25c on stars with relatively good results. However, i have been thinking is there a way to maximize my ev by perhaps finding weaker action on different sites. I have tried doing my own research but i've found a lot of the stuff is outdated. I am looking to take rake, rakeback, quality of play and volume into account when finding the ideal site. i am quite content playing 6 tables ( i have the ability to play more, however stars and maybe 888 are the only sites that could cater this in PLO) and as a result do not mind playing without a hud (on sites that don't allow them) as these sites have a much larger volume of recreational players. all opinions would be great for me to listen to. remember: rake, rakeback , quality of play and volume (aiming for 6 tables minimum running) is what i am trying to take into account to find the optimal site. thanks a lot and i hope RIO poker is the one that provides me with what i want.
Nov. 15, 2016 | 9:04 a.m.
This will go against everything this site stands for, but...... i think there should be a run it twice button
Oct. 29, 2016 | 11:08 p.m.
Be a lad phil and put in as many mixed games as you can. thank you :)
also during a good amount of time during the day it is possible to 10 table PLO20 and 8 table PLO50
Nov. 15, 2016 | 7:48 p.m.