Rynaldo900
9 points
Great video. I think something like this for SRP as BB against a c/c line where we exploit an IP player who Cbets at too high of a frequency would be a good follow up to this
June 14, 2019 | 5:43 p.m.
I really enjoyed this style of video and hope to see more in the future!
Sept. 4, 2018 | 10:58 p.m.
Hey Jeremy. Good video overal and it was great seeing someone navigate through PT4 and setting up reports especially because I am newer to this software. Despite the few mistakes that some have pointed out, the video still holds a lot of value in educating ways to review hands and looking at your database
Dec. 5, 2016 | 4:45 p.m.
Kind of an ugly spot but with the board pairing I think it's a call. Unlikely for him to ever have a 3 here unless it's A3 or pocket 3s which I think are more likely to raise the flop given how draws it is. He could be turning KcQc or K10 into a bluff or trying to bluff you off of a chop with a weak ace. The more I talk about it the less value hands I see him having as I think he would raise most of them on earlier street. You also have a queen blocking QJ and he didnt 3 bet pre either which makes me think his hand is more towards medium broadway cards and low suited connectors
Nov. 23, 2016 | 2:30 a.m.
I think you played it fine. Cbet looks like a good play on the flop. You still have a lot of equity on the turn and check calling seems bad as well as depending on bet size you'll be forced to check fold. So overall it looks like you played it fine
Nov. 10, 2016 | 6:23 p.m.
Looks fine. I'd be more likely to raise pre with KJ off but being suited gives you more playability on the flop. As played I think it seems fine, could consider checking back flop which is what I would do sometimes
Oct. 4, 2016 | 12:04 a.m.
I've been having trouble playing big PP in 4 bet/5 bet situations. This is mostly when I play hands like JJ,QQ, and AK where I'll 3 bet and face a 4 bet. In General is it better to flat having position or to jam? I also feel like most 4 bets in the micros are KK and AA and have been stacking off queens quite often in these situations which is a -ev play as villain rarely shows up with JJ or AK often enough.
Also when I open UTG with queens and get 3 bet by MP and I 4 bet, villain jams. Again is it better to flat out of position or to 5 bet jam. I feel like 4 bet fold queens can't be the right play and is exploitable but villains hardly ever 4 bet bluff and will usually run into a bigger PP.
I play mostly 5NL zoom so these reads are more population based rather than player based. Thanks for any feedback
Feb. 15, 2016 | 6:54 p.m.
It should be more table dependent imo. If you are being 4 bet too often you either need to adjust by 5 betting lighter or by 3 betting stronger. In micros, villain is not 4 bet bluffing often enough to implement a light 5 betting range. The adjustment in the micros is to 3 bet tighter
Feb. 15, 2016 | 6:46 p.m.
I think the call on the turn is fine. Fold river. I think villain has either AA, KK, QQ with a diamond
Feb. 10, 2016 | 8:38 p.m.
Because the board is very wet I think you might want to check/call the turn and evaluate on turn. When we bet the turn and get raised it puts us in a gross spot. I don't think villain jams with just a naked flush draw. Something like KhQh is more likely to call than to jam. He could be semi-bluffing with some combo draws but you block A7/A6 of hearts. The problem I think is that you don't really beat any of his value range. I think his range looks mostly like 2 pair, turned straights, sets, pair plus flush draw, straight and flush draws. He raised on the bn so he could easily have suited connectors in his range. With that being said I don't think you beat much of his value range and even his bluffs have good equity against you.
Feb. 10, 2016 | 8:37 p.m.
Even if CO has a set, you can most likely get it all in against the SB who likely isn't stronger than KK in this situation. Could easily have something like A10, K10, JJ, QQ. A lot of hands that you dominate so even if you lose the main you still profit in the side pot. I would also 3 bet pre so that you can isolate against the SB
Sept. 24, 2015 | 5:31 p.m.
Call river, but betting the turn gives you much more information than checking where you are limited
Sept. 23, 2015 | 7:16 p.m.
Don't need to over bet, if you want a larger sizing maybe close to pot would be good?
Sept. 23, 2015 | 7:14 p.m.
I think villain bets most of his kings on the turn so I would feel pretty confident when he checks back the turn.
My plan would be to x/c the river
Sept. 23, 2015 | 7:13 p.m.
Shove here. He does have AA in some situations but you still have to go for
It since villains play ranges so much at these stakes
Sept. 23, 2015 | 7:10 p.m.
I agree I think it's a fold. Villain has to call flop with either a pair, straight draw, or flush draw. He only VB an 8 here and maybe some queens. He could have spade draws but I don't think often enough for it to be profitable
Sept. 23, 2015 | 7:08 p.m.
Tough spot, I probably call it off. Villains play so widely in these limits that they can often have AK/AA in these spots, but also hands like K10/KJ/ nut diamond draw. Unless you have a specific read on villain I would call it off
Sept. 23, 2015 | 7:05 p.m.
I think a check raise is actually an interesting idea on the flop if you want to go that route. I think check calling and trying to hit the straight isn't the best option. If you hit the straight on the river and bet out, it turns your hand rather face up. Unlikely villain is super strong when there are so many two pair and straight combos he likely checks behind the river if you check the nuts. Since the button will raise wider and almost always CBet on this type of flop, I think a check raise is an interesting idea to fold out a lot of his range. That way if he hit the straight, our hand is very disguised and we can pick up a heart on the turn making it a very profitable spot to double barrel
Sept. 23, 2015 | 7:03 p.m.
Turn is a tricky card. I would either barrel again on the turn and if we get raised or don't improve on the river give up on the hand. Or check/fold. Check calling makes it rather difficult because our only goal is to catch the straight at this point. Villain can definitely have J10/Q10/KQ/AK in this spot so once he gets into us on the turn I think we have to give it up
Sept. 23, 2015 | 6:58 p.m.
Looks fine. Villain most likely has a 10 in this spot or was floating with KQ, also likely for Villain to have K10 here. I doubt villain is floating with nothing and unlikely he's betting a small pair here. Fold and pick a better spot
Sept. 22, 2015 | 11:38 p.m.
I feel like you played it well. Do you run into JJ, QQ, or AA in this spot sometimes? Yes, but I still feel like it's profitable in the long run. I guess it is a little more difficult since you block a lot of AK/KQ combos, but I think it would be a pretty tight fold in this spot. I call it off and hope villain was being stubborn with AJ of diamonds or something
Sept. 22, 2015 | 11:35 p.m.
I probably raise the turn. Lots of draws that villain will call with, might also call with two pair a lot of the time. I think calling is bad since there are a lot of river cards you will lose equity on, or cards that you will lose action against. I think raising the turn is probably the best option
On T74 you x/r J9 and overbet a turn Q saying you are going polar to jam river with 2p plus. Where does your QK-AA fit in this range? Do you carve out a smaller turn size as well or play for two streets of value with this part of your range?
June 29, 2019 | 9:26 p.m.