Rgrubz37

A lot of wisdom in this video pertaining not only to poker but life. The parts about knowledge being forever and doing the things that align with your long term incentives really hit home for me. Looking forward to this series.

This video was not only very interesting but has helped me gain a much better understanding of this spot. I have struggled with these boards for a while and I think many other players would say the same. A common theme in the sims was check raising weaker broadways to fold out stronger ones. Another added benefit of this is when you do turn top pair you are dominated less often by a stronger one. Do you think this also plays a role in our frequencies similarly to only betting Ace highs when we can get stronger ones to fold or weaker ones to call?

Hi Krzysztof, I really enjoyed this format.
In the second sim I was a little surprised to see the overbet being the preferred sizing on the 7h turn. Do you think this is a result of OOP checking so often on the flop? I would think a smaller sizing would put hands like 8x and overpairs without a heart in a tougher spot. I guess flushes/sets and your best bluffs care more about playing for stacks and denying equity than putting the middling portion of OOP's range in a tough spot?
Looking forward to more content!

Really enjoyed this video Henry. I know you said you prefer using a smaller sizing on a lot of flops as you think population will overfold and under check raise. I would say the same thing is applicable for my player pool at lower stakes. However from my experience population also plays poorly on many turns including probing way too merged and overbluffing. Do you think the EV you gain from using range bets on many boards is greater than forcing players to develop a probing range on the turn where they will also make many mistakes?

Awesome video. I would love to see something similar for different spots like btn v bb srp in the future.

At lower stakes players still tend to bet these boards for a larger sizing like 50%-66%. Facing this sizing do you think the lower PPs like 44-88 with no spade would be pure folds and the ones with spades are still defended?

In the first hand you mentioned that you think villain may be betting too many Kx or bluffs on the turn. If you were to node lock his turn betting range do you think the raise frequency would go up significantly for your hand/range or do you still want to be mostly calling because most of the Qx you have is weak?