Red-3Bet-Invest

Great video, richard, as usual.
At 13:49, You mentioned hands like KK with the Jc pretty much always lead( also hands like 44s), even though they have way more showdown value than a hands like yours. Do you think that might be because there is a value element also attached to it, as you mentioned pretty much every two pair with a club has to herocall the river, which also made me wonder that OOP must have some very low equity hands that lead rivers( to make a hand like A7 with a club indifferent), which might they be? Having a very hard time thinking about it, maybe some hands like A568 with a club? But that might just be a flop fold, without a backdoor flush draw, and given how many value hands we are gonna have, we probably needs to find a lot more leads with hands like these.

At 33:28, can we have a blocking range on the river? Or is this a range check spot for us? If we do have a blocking range, which kind of bluffs will we be using? Maybe Ac with a 7?

Great video Nuno, looking forward to more. Do you think it might be a good idea, to also provide some theoritical basis to these videos, before we dive into some practical hand examples?
Also at 59:48, even though all the 9x with an overcards are indifferent( also 8x with an overcard), but there seems to be a clear preference for calling when we have a J, T or a K kicker, and for folding when we have a Q kicker. This seems to be related some some of exploits our opponent can make based on the river card, but i am finding it a little hard to figure it out by myself. Can you maybe shed some light on this? Also how can we apply this in game?

Hey Richard, amazing video as usual :)
At 20:43, i really can't understand the logic here, maybe i misunderstood it. You mentioned with a 7 we block his misses(ie potential bluffs facing checks). Wouldn't that be an arguement for betting instead of checking?

Also,at 26:57, i couldn't understand the reason why blocking a T seems more relevant while betting a hand like ours. Since our opponent polarized flop, shouldn't it be more relevant to block flop value than turned value ( like flop set, flop 2P). If he was rangebetting flop then i would surely understand it, as T in general will block more value, but since he has a healthy checking frequency, it kind of beats me.

Hey Richard,
I would really like to praise you as a coach. Honestly, your quality is better than everything else there is in the market for plo coaching, by far. I am primarily a NLHE player, who has only recently started dabbling in plo, and watching your videos, i get the feeling that i used to get while watching KRab( Kevin Rabichew) videos 2-3 years back, they just absolutely changed the way i used to think about NHLE, and even though they were filled with incredible information, motivated me to work even harder on my game, by myself. So I feel absolutely privileged to have you as a RIO coach. Please keep this up :)
Also, do you think maybe do some focus theory videos every once in a while? Even though every liveplay of yours is like 3-4 theory videos combined, i think it will be very educational as a viewer to see a focused theory video every once in a while( maybe a theory video on, say betsizing, in plo).
Thanks

Great video luke!

At 23:38, i feel that the flop fold with 99s is just too nitty. I have not run a sim to support that, but i think we will be folding way too much if we fold 99s. Also, arguably 99s is probably a better call against a polarized range than even a K, as when we do improve, we still get value from his range.

Great video. For people who don't know, if you want to skip a hand ( like the monotone hand), you can press ctrl + n. You don't have to play through to the end.

JTs did look like quite an overfold, considering villain will have KJ, KT pure and will shove river for value. Ran the sim for this one, and JTs was pure shoving. But if checked, it was a 75bb~ call vs a jam. Won't be worth as much in reality, as PIO was floating a lot of random Jxs OTT and bluffing on the river, as well as shoving AQ pure for value. But still think that call there will be considerably winning.