QuesoLover69

Just a sanity test, getting -128 would infer a shove correct? I thought when optimal bet size was negative it inferred checking > betting?

So Im still confused on the topic.

We calculate our equity vs villains defending range on the river to derive a optimal bet size however, villains defending range is a function of our bet size, so how can we accurately assign them a bluffcatching range if we dont know our bet size in the first place?

I guess from what I understand then is we are calculating our range vs villains range up to that point in the hand minus any hands in villains range that would not be able to beat our weakest bluff?

secondly regarding adding bluffs,,

I think this makes sense, " maybe the formula is made so that we only have to take into account the equity of our Value range and then we can build the bluffing range corresponding to this betsizing?"

Otherwise if the change in equity vs villains range when adding bluffs is to be considered, when could we stop iterating?

Thank you very much for this series, very well presented information & a great topic.