Pokerdeals

19:34. When having K7 k2, betting more w 2nd and 3rd fb, could be cause that blocks the strongest and main continueing region in their calling ranges(as they will have more 2nd 3rd flshes thn nutflushes in their range distribution in comparison w PfR) , u can fold out baby flushes and get some value from Kx or 72. And then as u said that leaves their raising ranges more defined twds nf or nfb as u said.
Could this make sense?

I understand and subscribe the XB w the weak 2 on that trip board, it does makes sense. A side question that comes to mind would be, are u ever taking some of ur weakest 2x on the flop (w better suckout potential vs top of his range), and start betting it on the flop so that u can have some bad 2x on a triple barrel bluff when the board gets dirty? Or is it not necessary, since some of the bettable 2x on the flop, become weak on the turn (and w some extra blocker qualities), u start 2nd barrel bluff accordingly w some of those, and just XB and go for value on other runouts.
Don't know if I explained myself clearly enough. Hopefully you understand what I mean.

9:30, after XR flop on the str8 board, u say IP is likely to have the polarity advg, and it makes sense since he indeed has all the t8 combos that bcall turn, and many of ur flop nut str8ts are no longer nuts. My question is, aren't u biased in this statement cos u XR bare 68, in a spot where, as u mentioned urself, and generally speaking,u should xc bare 68, and xr more of 68+ added eq, i.e, fh outs, higher str8 redraw, hence , making polarity ott a bit closer/more symmetric between the 2 players, as he still contains all the t8, but u also have ur fair amount of t8 combos as t8, is a significant part of both ur vale and semibluff xr flop range(68T, 88T, 8tj+pair, etc). If polarity symmetry is the case, should the turn strategy involve a fair amount of X and some medium sized betting, so that u can keep getting value w 68, and target his sets, 2 pairs and bare 68 to indifference?

Min 18:12. Not accounting for the fact that hand is trash and not playable, but about the 3+2 ds version being more playable than the perfect ds in that instance, i think it does make sense actually, when holding non high cards/suits. Having a strong flush, and nut flush, is much more relevant in 5c, so if u only have the chance to hit a shitty flush, u might as well have 3 of the suit so at least the hand is a better bcatcher in a postflop situation if it was to happen. What do u think?