PhilExploitfond
0 points
o cool, thanks.
March 26, 2014 | 1:39 p.m.
I dont have HEM or PT so dno where i can get the HH from and so i dont have any numbers on him.
March 26, 2014 | 1:31 p.m.
Well i really cant believe his 4bet to be weaker than QQ, AK, because i almost never see such thing, if i do then its probably a more than average active/aggressive/loose player against whom i perhaps would have made the call.. but in this case he seemed to be just an ordinary citizen and so i made my decision based on that assumption.
March 26, 2014 | 1:29 p.m.
I call 4bet cos its such a small 4bet, which i thought would be reasonable to call, i expect his range to be very strong since i very rarely see a 4bet in NL5 and he was not an aggressive player. So I really dont see villain 4betting with AQ, so i think he is at QQ+ rarely AK (2x 4bet makes it even less possible for AQ or AK imo), So I call in hopes of outflopping his QQ,KK or get some flush outs.
So this is very good flop for his range, im behind all of his believed range except rare occasion AK ( which i really cant see him 2x 4beting and on which case we just split.
March 26, 2014 | 1:22 p.m.
Do you people agree with folding being best play here or am i wrong?
No real info on villain except that hes not an obvious fish/donk, rather patient amateur.
http://www.boomplayer.com/en/poker-hands/Boom/8135341_59C3D1912A
Theres nothing that i beat here unless he decided to go crazy which is very unlikely right?
My best scenario is splitting against AK right?
Most of the time im up against AA or KK ?
March 25, 2014 | 5:47 p.m.
So Daz you think if i excpect villain not to be station but rather 1 tabling careful amateur, then it aint good spot? Cos thats what i expected.
March 25, 2014 | 10:48 a.m.
Yeah since he completes on BB, hes range easily includes 79d, pehaps 57d, JTd, 9Td, even some bad diamond kicker Queens, also i see people lead in these spots with like 68.. so call and raise on a safe turn imo.
March 25, 2014 | 8:35 a.m.
Would it be normal to include 22-77 in Heros 3bet range here? if no then a thinking regular wont believe you here. What could you be representing here, you wont turn your J into a bluff, also you would not check OTT with J.
March 23, 2014 | 2:20 p.m.
On the second (or should i say eleventh) thought .. here opponent leads like 70% of pot which makes me hesitate if what i said is true ... I would definately stand by it if opponents bets up to 50% but... mnjaa
March 22, 2014 | 9:26 p.m.
Well i still stand by the fact that opponent is more often weak when he leads out like that after flop check/call... they are like pls dont bet too much into me and so they protect their hand by leading.. often with draws and middle/bottom pair.
Although on some board textures and opponents that is not the case.
March 22, 2014 | 9:22 p.m.
Yes i know how to play these stakes, ive been through them before but i was 4 tabling to learn and do my best thinking about situations and it just gets really boring to stick to abc, so to make things more interesting i was looking for spots to bluff.
March 22, 2014 | 9:18 p.m.
where are these stations when i have T or better lol
March 22, 2014 | 5:06 p.m.
Dont you think hes got worst than pair of T there like atleast 60% of time?
March 22, 2014 | 5:06 p.m.
Villain 1 tabling bad player, not quite brainless station, rather bit patient amateur.
How bad is my play here? i was feeling a bit spewy/aggressive and cant decide if i played OK or bad.
Id like your answer being taking in count that villain is unknown bad 1 tabling player.
http://www.boomplayer.com/en/poker-hands/Boom/8078866_4FBF358908
His turn lead made me think he is weaker than pair of tens and i should/could go full throttle.
Why dont you include KJ in his range? Also perhaps 88 is less unlikely because he would like to get more chips in on the flop with such str8 drawy board?
March 29, 2014 | 3:46 p.m.