My opinion is they are rigged. Some people are replying thats crazy and why would they do that, but my question is why would nt they do that? How much did the guy pay for bovadas software or platform? Kinda crazy that they made this deal and it allowed for bovada to just create another poker site, but anyways, i want to investigate why they wouldnt keep the licensing that bovada had that at least provides a better regulation. Just bc players win doesnt mean the house isnt dealing winning hands to its own bot on miracle 1 card in the deck to win rivers which happen 1:7 hands i play. People win hundreds of thousands on slot machines, and the lottery for that fact, however neither of these games are giving the players a fair shot, so if i was a gambling guy, lol, id bet my last dollar there are definitely bots that favor the site, even if its only on 20% of hands, its 20% that are GUARANTEED winners to the house and considering the house play with 51/49 odds, im sure they are doing backflips for an extra 20% off the top. I have to wholeheartedly believe all on line sites have bots to a win a percentage of hands. This would account for people that "win" and would still account for the most UNBELIEVABLE run offs or 1card to win, or should i say lose, rivers. Finally, this would clear up things for me if someone, Maybe one of the people that know better can tell me why there are no live dealer hold em sites, not 1 anywhere on line. They have live ultimate poker, which is obviously set to a certain win loss percentage and they have live black jack,. Roulette, baccarat, etc, but why no live hold em? They could easily enough put cameras into the table and your pocket cards be dealt face down, there has to be some reason. So, it looks like a duck, and it sounds like a duck, then hopefully everyone gets their duck sick - quack, quack. Id be willing to bet anyobe that the sites definitely have bots that work in their favor and give them a higher edge of hands. Again i ask, why WOULDNT they?
My opinion is they are rigged. Some people are replying thats crazy and why would they do that, but my question is why would nt they do that? How much did the guy pay for bovadas software or platform? Kinda crazy that they made this deal and it allowed for bovada to just create another poker site, but anyways, i want to investigate why they wouldnt keep the licensing that bovada had that at least provides a better regulation. Just bc players win doesnt mean the house isnt dealing winning hands to its own bot on miracle 1 card in the deck to win rivers which happen 1:7 hands i play. People win hundreds of thousands on slot machines, and the lottery for that fact, however neither of these games are giving the players a fair shot, so if i was a gambling guy, lol, id bet my last dollar there are definitely bots that favor the site, even if its only on 20% of hands, its 20% that are GUARANTEED winners to the house and considering the house play with 51/49 odds, im sure they are doing backflips for an extra 20% off the top. I have to wholeheartedly believe all on line sites have bots to a win a percentage of hands. This would account for people that "win" and would still account for the most UNBELIEVABLE run offs or 1card to win, or should i say lose, rivers. Finally, this would clear up things for me if someone, Maybe one of the people that know better can tell me why there are no live dealer hold em sites, not 1 anywhere on line. They have live ultimate poker, which is obviously set to a certain win loss percentage and they have live black jack,. Roulette, baccarat, etc, but why no live hold em? They could easily enough put cameras into the table and your pocket cards be dealt face down, there has to be some reason. So, it looks like a duck, and it sounds like a duck, then hopefully everyone gets their duck sick - quack, quack. Id be willing to bet anyobe that the sites definitely have bots that work in their favor and give them a higher edge of hands. Again i ask, why WOULDNT they?
May 18, 2019 | 7:47 a.m.