OnceOrTwice

Can you list them? Because I find some troubles in seeing them... I have to remind you he's a 15/10 over 100 hands

Do you realize that by putting Villain on the flush you are looking at 3-4 combos at max while you are leaving out lower sets and overpairs with an heart?

^ Right, I misread the turn bet size, I thought it was closer to pot

Villain doesn't have only FDs but an overpair along with it, so his hand is way more stronger than the FD alone. Yeah he's a nit but overpairs with an heart are still in his range and you cannot be sure how he's going to play them.
Another point, since he' a nit, why aren't you folding your hand OTF? If he doesn't have a bluff on the flop, he won't have it on the turn

Since your are posting the hand I'm assuming you lost vs a flush :p
Anyway, I think I would shove the turn and swear to god if he has it. A 10% raise is very low, but it also contains a very few combos of flushes, A♥T♥+ are in his range for sure, but you can also add other small flushes, maybe Villain was tired of folding you don't know for sure. I want to point out that Villain has JJ+ in his range always, and he doesn't like fold his hand often, and he shouldn't. He's playing a few hands, he can't expect to flop a nutted hand every single time, but he should have the best hand often at least on the flop. The actions are consistent with an overpair with a heart, especially on the flop. Without any postflop read I'm assuming he's folding any over with an heart so I would shove OTT.
Folding the river is a clear mistake after you called the turn, Villain shows a lot of strenght OTF and OTT, do you expect to shut down often? I don't, so you are calling the turn to fold on any unpairred river.

Ty for the reply, well... I want to exploit basic leaks in Villain's game. For example if - - he's is opening too much and folding often vs 3bets or calling too much and x/f on the flop. Probably, since I'm going to analyze this glaring leaks, maybe it's just better to do a BTN vs blinds spot. Probably, players that having the previous leaks aren't paying too much attentio whether the 3bet comes from the SB or the BB. What do you think?

Unfortunately this video isn't from RIO, I posted here since this forums has a lot of traffic while the original one hasn't

up

I don't know whether that stat is going to help me with the decision, due to the akward stack sizes. One thing I know for sure, he's going to stab a lot vs missed cbets

I want to isolate him

ty guys

I like your TP, honestly, I don't know whether is capable to shove busted draws, I don't have enough evidence, anyway I can do a population analysis to find out at least the frequencies. Ty for the input

I think checking the flop is a huge mistake 4way...also by checking the flop you allow many opponents to see the turn card for free. But imo the main issue is with your idea of betting turn+river, if you do that you are missing one street of value, since on the river, the busted draws are going to fold.

Hi, ty for your reply.
I'm a beginner in a sense that I'm playing NL 25 so yeah I'm a beginner, but I have a 300 hands sample at that level and I'm a 4 bb/100 winner. Even that my game is full of leaks like this one and I'm gonna fix really basic spots that give me troubles.
Regarding the hand, Villain could have many holdings, we could be ahead on the flop many times, so I thought about betting in order to avoid him betting and then I should guess whether to do

@Gaucan
I'm a beginner, so I don't know what you really expect. Glad you are feeling less retarded tho. Gl at the tables

SB is really aggrofish and I expect a squeeze a lot of times.
I like the 3bet preflop idea tho, this should avoid the squeeze and if OR calls it's most likely he doesn't have a premium hand so I can put some pressure on hin

Hero cannot check in this spot, he's the BTN :D

ty for pointing it out :)

My hand is probably best, and as Disharmonist said, Villain could have worse. So I betting the turn for value. There's no need to check and get tricky imo, in order to get real value from this kind of play you should play against a tricky villain, which isn't the my case. He is more on the passive side, so I'm not going to induce anything.
The fact here is to think if we are going to commit or not and whether he has enough worse hands in his range.
If you include enough worse hands that are strong to call a turn bet, i don't see any reason why I shouldn't betting

I'm agree with you regarding weaker holdings that could broke here.
But what about his sizes? He check/minraises twice, this make his range narrower imo.
I expect worse sets, two pair Ah9x to just shove or call on the turn...
what do you think?