Muten
8 points
Depends of what you want to learn, but (I am new too) I have been suggested for nlhe DjuNKeLL, Cameron Couch and Steve Paul.
And I must say that it was a very good suggestion.
May 25, 2015 | 9:40 a.m.
KJo UTG is really the bottom. I think I need a clue that the table is tight to open that.
I would cbet. Although short he can still fold here, not commited. And it makes sense regarding the range we represent. I don't need more reasons :).
May 20, 2015 | 4 p.m.
I would cbet more on the flop, why do you give them the price to draw ? Especially multi I would cbet 69% - 75% pot here.
And I would not bet river, simply because I don't like to bet fold here and I think it's what you should do when raised here and I like my odds at SD.
But again probably wrong curious to see what others will say :).
May 20, 2015 | 3:54 p.m.
Why don't you like to cbet ? I would cbet readless.. This A high board hits him but hits you too. He can defend (and should) with a broader range than just AJ+ 99+ KQo. Curious what others will say but to me this is a cbet. If you never cbet this board I would not 3bet preflop.
May 20, 2015 | 3:48 p.m.
I would defend pre also. flop ok. Turn I understand Jam rather than bet regarding stack but I would check back... What is wrong with that ?
May 18, 2015 | 12:08 p.m.
I disagree that the nut flush blocker would make me want to raise river here..
(I'm a fish, just my 2 cents ;)
May 12, 2015 | 8:35 p.m.
What about c/c turn to keep his range wide and get to a SD ? Then c/c or c/f depending on river and sizing. But probably almost never fold river..
CR / stack flop rather than turn - that one is an advise from a better player than me :) -
May 5, 2015 | 12:41 p.m.
Thank you all for your answers and wise advice.
I won't get discouraged and keep on working!
: )
April 24, 2015 | 12:26 a.m.
Hello anyone taking the time to read this,
I started being more "serious" about poker a few months ago. I am more of a creative person in my day job than a math type of guy (although I always loved math). Thank you everyone in the RIO community for bringing me from small stakes losing player - nah I am not ashamed ;) - to breakeven player. The journey is still quite long but I am enjoying it.
My question is : poker has evolved so much, and the mass of people is getting way more informed than before, wouldn't it be more interesting for starting players like me to focus on more obscure forms of poker like no limit 2-7 lowball than a popular form like no limit holdem or omaha? Sure the resources and scarce. But so is it for everyone else. It feels quite late for me to get in and hope ever being "ahead of the curve" in the most popular forms of poker.
I guess it's a silly question that I should answer for myself. But still I give it a shot and let's see if someone takes the time to give me his take on this :).
TL; DR : Wouldn't it be more interesting for starting players like me to focus on more obscure forms of poker like no limit 2-7 lowball than a popular form like no limit holdem or omaha?
April 23, 2015 | 12:52 p.m.
But for more serious chocolate, I think Belgian is still the way to go.
This.
And to stay with the belgian theme try those afterwards:
And congratz.
It's the button to allow shortcuts. I think it doesn't show if you don't have shortcuts assigned. Settings > Gameplay > Hotkeys
March 30, 2017 | 9:06 a.m.