Miko

More course type video series, and I don´t mean 2-3 parts but 5-10 part videos from the same coach(es) or so that the theme of the series has been determined and there´s no danger of coaches contradicting each other. For the most part, individual videos are a thing of the past imo and a longer series that really delves into the subject(s) are better. A video like "xxx 4-tabling NL50 ZOOM" is almost useless nowadays and very lazy, it´s not 2007 anymore. The Learning Paths has a good idea but again, I think a big fault in it is the inconsistency and the fact that the "series" consists of different coaches from different times and in some cases, different opinions on the same matter.

Agree 100%, session reviews are better imo. And the idea of having two coaches discusing someones play sounds really interesting.

9:20 57hh
What if the 3 bet was normal size and CO cold calls, do we still flat?
Just going in to a 4 way, 3-bet pot OOP with 7 high feels kinda risky, not going to be fun to play a big pot. Unless it´s a straight.

I agree. Also the fact that hero plays 6 tables makes it even harder.

Essential videos on 3-/4-betting where you go into more detail about 4 bet ranges.
Building a 4-bet / flatting 3-bet range etc.

I use the Flashback Express recorder which is free. It´s only for recording and playback so you can´t do any sort of editing. For this video I had 30 day trial of the Pro version which lets you do everything.
I´m sure Camtasia has that too, eiither by using the blur option or just a textbox, like I did.

Hi Steve, thanks for the review!

I recorded this 2 months ago and looking back, there were def some cringeworthy spots but that´s why we´re here for I guess :)
This was maybe my 2nd session ever at NL25 and there were spots where I was trying way too hard, like chasing chances to play with fish or players that were spewing their cash tickets, I did the same with my 4 NL ticket :)

And about my blind play, I actually said that I was afraid I was defending too wide, not tight.

At 18:00 with K9h
I find myself checking a lot on these kinds of spots, because I feel like I´m always getting (bluff) raised when I do bet :)
Same goes for thin value otr which I don´t do enough.

At 22:55 A7cc
I don´t know what that was, other than complete spew.
I hope I misread his stack or something.

Really looking forward to the next part, it was even crazier if I remember correctly.

I play on a site that doesn´t allow any 3rd party programs so I record all my sessions. Therefor I´d have tons of NL10/25 material for review if needed.

How about smaller stakes, NL10, NL25?

At 32:30 hero instacalls with AKs.
I understand that AKs is a premium hand but isn´t it a flip at best most of time?
I haven´t seen anyone shove AQ pf since 2009 at 100 bb deep, atleast not in a cash game.
Anytime I try this, villain has AA/KK/QQ, sometimes JJ/AK.

I realise that villain might be squeezing light here but after the shove, I think I would atleast think about it before I call 3/4 of my stack and pray for two live cards.
I know that the topic of "playing AK" has been argued forever but I just hate playing it.

Since no one has brought it up here nor did Cameron mention it, I guess it´s standard.

I´d be very interested to see a series about playing on sites that don´t allow tracking of any kind, no HUDS, HEMs, PTs etc.
Do you approach these kind games any diiferently, if so, how?
I play on a site like this atm and have tons of game footage playing NL10 and PLO4 since I record all my sessions.
So I´d be willing to give some footage for review.

I agree a bit with seanshephard, not that I´m cancelling my membership.
But I thought that most /all of these hands pretty much play themselves after the actual sqeeze. I would´ve hoped for trickier spots after the squeeze. Not that the AAA hand wasn´t tricky on the river but you know what I mean.