Mheitz

RunItTw1ce i think maybe the thing you are missing is that since it’s dry in the sense that the A is top pair, it’s true that your Kx type hands are winning against most of his range, but when you bet you will narrow their range significantly such that by turn your are probably at a range disadvantage and Often your Kx is going to need runner runner to improve. You say it’s probably printing and I agree at low stakes it is usually a good exploit to cbet a bit more but range cbet is just going to be too high % and you will lose EV. With like Kx you are going to make more money checking ahead and keeping hands you are a big favorite in the pot and then both hitting a pair you dominate and getting money in the pot rather than betting a board where you really only fold out hands that you have huge equity against or get called by many hands that you’re more or less dead against.

This is for sure both an easy spot to mess up and a lower like 45% frequency c-bet board. Like Kx will probably be nearly 100% checking here Qx a lot of checking as well. But I do think the T9o will like to take a 33% sizing here like 30-40% of the time maybe a little more bc the 63 is pretty disconnected and the BB shouldn’t have too too much 3x like hell have only suited 3x and not 100% of many of those combos. So it’s a little dryer and safer OOP in future streets for value hands. T9 benefits from both getting calls from 6x and having overcard equity in the future and folding out jack high queen high and some king high. I also think in low stakes cash a higher cbet frequency is typically Just a good exploit.

James Obst Idk if any of you guys look at this video anymore, but as a player of less than one year I'm wondering if card removal should come into play as a relevant factor here at around 26:00? Obviously it's easy now to see AK has only two outs and that AA or KK is very unlikely. But since we know all theses players are good and not really fuckin around too much, aren't their calling ranges fairly well defined as mostly pocket pairs or Broadways which will heavily block QQ+? HJ vs UTG+2 should be fairly strong and the over-callers all know 1. they are facing strong ranges 2. their equity falls exponentially faster than their pot odds improve 3. their RIO against as stronger field will not be able to make up for their multiway equity losses.