MarkGomes

The game NL2, NL5 and NL10 are the same.
If you're doing well in NL2, you'll also do well in NL5. Keep using the same strategy. Be patient and do not let the limit rise affect your thoughts.

XC flop, XC turn and fold river.

Call OTR.
3bet PF, and X/C flop, X/C turn.
You open the door to villain to bluff. You have that call here.

On the river hit all two higher pairs than your or str8. (AT, AJ, AQ, AK)
IMO nice play.

Why cbet 0,74 in 2,35? TPTK on flop with Str8 draw and FD you have cbet more.
Turn, bet again. 50% is sufficient.

The villian has set on flop, right?

I think the cbet size should be bigger. 0,40~0,50. Villians in micro stacks call a lot.
I play equal. The check-raise turn could be sets. I pot control.

Everybody could call 3bet with T9s?
I fold it.
What more do you call here?

Yes. Excel.
Send me your e-mail and I send for you.

No info, is realy complicated.
Involved stacks don't give space to 5bet/fold, so we have 5bet all in.
But we supose that the SB does this like TT+, AJ+, We have fold equity here.
TT, JJ and QQ (improbable), AJ, AQ and AKo probable will fold PF if we all in. I think he call only AA, KK and AKs.
Now, if the stats and info say that he to do only AA, KK and AKs, so we have fold.
See image I sent. I calculated if our 5bet is +EV or not.

I agree with you in parts. In MP and UTG tends to show only premium hands. But I don't think this situation above.
I don't fold this spot, because is a excelent spot to SB steal.
CO try steal, BN 3bet and all this can light. It's better oportunitty to SB try steal.
What do you think?

I would fold PF QTs on the SB, IMHO.
As played, I would cbet flop about 0,65~0,70.
This flop don't hits your range of 3bet and maybe villian could float.
OTT:
- Over cards: X/C
- Open draw: I could bet 50% or X/R.
What do you think?

cbet and shove turn too, but I cbet $10 flop and the pot $33,97 and my stack turn will be $33,75, so I open shove and not check-raise. This board is very very draw so I don't like of to give free cards.

On the flop there is very check behind. We have value. We can to lead flop too, to extract FD.
As played.. IMHO, It's very strange to be passive flop and agressive turn. I reraise turn about $1,20 and allin river if no any diamonds.

I don't see Aces or KK in size cbet of BB, IMHO, because the stats shows TAG player, and a TAG player size cbet 70%~80% this flop, right? So I bet more in turn to extract of KxQs, KxJs, KxTs, QxQs, JxJs, etc.

And here when you create a new post choice "new hand history"

I prefer 3bet PF, but this conditions for trap I think OK. ("i flatted because the BB had shown he had a tendency to SQ quite wide")
Sick hand. When you raise flop, in villian's head you can be bluffing, becouse this flop don't hit range UTG , but turn when he check-raise I dont think that he is "bluffing your bluff". Right? Our you think could he play so? Do you think he check-raised all in with JJ,QQ, KK our draws+overcards AKs, AQs?

You can access sites like this:
http://www.handconverter.com/

Versus two players I think the cbet should be bigger. About 50% of pot. Because we be could call 77, 88, TT, JJ, QQ, AKs that they played so PF. As played, if the CO is reg, I play equal, because your check turn (3bet PF, bet flop, Turn: Ac - FD - check versus two) induces him the bet river with JJ, QQ, TT and bluff. Aces you don't have playing so,

I think yes.
I prefer to call than raise, because raise will show great value and we will expel AK, AQ, JJ because the players are reg. QQ will play flat call. Maybe AKs flat call. But we have two K.
KK is premium hand and we can flat call OOP sometimes.
I think this.

GL GL.

Check call river.
If the villain have AK he 3bet PF.
Three of a Kind (TT, 33) or 2 pairs (A3, AT) raised flop or turn, because there is many players in hand.
I think flush draw failed this river.
GL.