Leetnewb

@26min Jman misses auto c-bet

I was thinking that maybe Jungleman doesn't have any cold calls and is implementing extremely wide 4bet range as he is 300bb deep IP bvb, which would obviously lead to a higher freq flop check strat.

Saw you at Barcelona and almost came to thank you in person for this great content you put up here. Keep up the good work !

For future videos I would like to see different approaches under ICM pressure on final tables adjusting on villain's playing style

More videos with holdemresources! One of the best essential content as always. Ty

Good video. I would like to see those final table icm pressure toyed with icmizer in the future vids if possible :) really educational

Excellent MTT video, plenty of new ideas. Thx

Good video! I have watched most of videos twice already :) Will the next video be live Zoom ?;) Its been a while!

Imo fold pre. The reg is 3betting at 5% so what will it be vs your UTG? probably just KK and AA. The pot odds are great but even if you bink an ace, which is at ~1/6 frequency (assuming nobody blocks you) the big blind can still have AK and sb AA which is trouble for you.

As played I would just bet the flop and check it down. The nitty reg is probably just pot controlling and playing the overpair as a bluffcatcher now when the board ran well for sets in your ranges. What did the villain ended up having? KK?

Also I would probably just give up on turn if the villain keeps barreling as the board mashes his 4bet calling range and he doesn't seem too spew with just 5% 3bet.

I think the better play post-flop would be check-calling the flop and playing it as a bluff catcher because IMO you can't get value from about anything worse. You somehow managed to win tho, villain had KQs?

Stats of villain? 3bet from bb most importantly for readers to analyse if its profitable to defend the 3bet. And then F4B bvb to see if its profitable to 4bet bluff in this spot?

At 7:00 you fold 99 vs btn squeeze. If you assume that an unknown (as you don't have sample on him) doesn't have a bluffing range here and he's only doing this with AQo+ and TT+ shouldn't this still be a close'ish call?

Is A3s standard fold for you against a CO open? 4.42

Where exactly can I find my standard deviation in HEM2, Ive red that it should appear somewhere in reports -> stats, but somehow cant find it 

Good video. Not too "theory heavy" which usually makes it slow. Really enjoyed- thx

I would fold if facing ck/r from this kind of a villain (Solid nit-reg). What is his steal %? Also, I would consider 3-betting 99 from the sb if he is a solid reg and opens 50%+ from the button

What do you mean by giving up? Still bet the turn but fold to a raise.

I only play NL50/NL100 but ive never seen anything else than nuts when 3-bet jammed on the river. This is because of the stakes thought.

Anyway, I can't put him on a hand. Anyone else having the same problem? You are 200bb deep so do you think he is defending suited connectors such as 78s and then turned a flush on river? Not really sure if he would 3-bet jam a small flush either.

I guess that he just called behind with Ax and was valuebetting river and after your raise turned it to a bluff.

I would consider calling because I don't think there is enough if any Qdxd or Txdx diamond combos that can defend your 3-bet and then call behind on the flop.

Without doubt he will call with KQ then imo.

I would play as played. What are your stats? If not incredibly tight I'd assume he will flat KQo but fold KJo. Also, is 5bb raise from UTG your standard play?

If you don't have reads of the villain- how can you assume he will never bluff here? And I mean NEVER, and you still beat a big margin of his value hands. If he thinks that there is a chance you could 4-bet bluff, he would play at least QQ/AK this way and then go with it if faced shove. Not to mention pure bluffs

The 5-bet size is not very far from standard as you can't commit much more of your stack as a bluff since you just end up calling the rest if you do. The sizing shouldn't matter if the villain is a good player, I have noticed that bad players will shove AK because they don't want to see flop with it and they don't know anything about balanced ranges.

I would bet my money on aces after we saw how the hand played till the turn but it can still be QQ Imo. Regardless I would have shoved PF.

Is there any reason he could have tried to level you to shove as a bluff? What are your stats?

Yep, call. 39% Equity needed. Against range like Q8-QK you are 52.5% (assuming villain is donk and defends all kind of crap on bb). He certainly wouldn't play sets this way and don't think 2p either. If we put some smaller flushdraws in his jamming range you get even more greater odds to call.

I agree with the fold, there is way too few combos that he will be doing this and will fold on the river, also we can't assume he will check-raise nut FD on the turn all that often either (at least not always). We will face overpairs too often that he will not fold.

Imo there should be 2 combos of 8's in villains range too. (Ad8d, As8s). But other than that he would probably need at least AT+ to flat the flop.

So if he is somewhat solid and not opening uber aggro, there should be only 3 FD combos. Comparing this to 2 combos of A8x, 3 combos of JJ and 18 combos of QQ+ we get 23. Easy fold.

I agree this hand was overplayed but me and the villain had history on the table and I think that he was having an idea that I was trying to run him over.

About the hand; 

So should I just call the 3-bet on flop and see if he gives up with the bluffs on turn? And in this case fold to turn bet? I also think that he doesn't open T8-K8o but I may be wrong! 

Really appreciate your answer and hope to hear a reply from you as well :) Oh, and thanks for the tip- Ill post the next hand with the way you described

What are your stats?

Thanks for the answer. Much appreciated :)