LLwesL

What is your roi , over what sample?

Id say depends on the limits you are playing. if it the lower limits say 16.50 or below, 11, or 5.50 I would call. if its 22 dollars and above I would lay down a,k suited vs 4bet cold and 5bet.

that being said. having some information on your opponents is key here id say.

I feel like an apple right now

The term you are looking for when introducing a basic exploit is a dominant strategy I think.

as this is purely a strategy game we want to pick a dominant strategy. commonly used in mathematics and economics. This is the best possible strategy, always.

A strategy is dominant if, regardless of what any other players do, the strategy earns a player a larger payoff than any other. Hence, a strategy is dominant if it is always better than any other strategy, for any profile of other players' actions. Depending on whether "better" is defined with weak or strict inequalities, the strategy is termed strictly dominant or weakly dominant. If one strategy is dominant, than all others are dominated. For example, in the prisoner's dilemma, each player has a dominant strategy.

That being said. Love the video, relearning some MTT stuff .

42% shove range is still ok, thatis what owen meant. it this is ok. not optimal ok.

going further.

bb startcaller a lot wider. therefore we need to open tighter? that seems legit strat @ 7.24

any body has some more thoughts about what we should be looking at in these spots to narrow down villians range? id say his or from that position and fold to 3bet. then his action on the flop vs cbet. and/or turncbet. .

btw bet/folding is also a very real choice.

I actually like the reraise all in on this board aswell ( a decent thinking player would then be folding his lower flush draws , which looked kinda ok to raise with otf. ) so I like tha play

id delayed cbet flop probably. i also like looking at his f2bet ratio. factoring this is with my 3bet % to have a better idea of his range of flop. giving flop I think it is going to connect pretty okish with his range. since its a wet board, leading into an aggresive player I would not do. cbetting the turn . reavluate from there?

meh. agree. zoommmzzz hard to acquire hands vs opponents.

as mentioned above: I think the decision to play 66s pre is based on many factors: what other players are at the table? many fish _> play them 6s. aggro , sqeeuze happy regs? fold that shit bruh

lol id like to see that please:)

where are bbs stats? that `ll tell you a bunch about his range.
he could have all kindz of hands here

awesome!

Hej Steve , can you tell us one more time the name of the program you use to plug in the "hands" obtained by random.org. seems like a neattt piece of software

how come

why make that switch? fairly new to hm2 myself

You might want to check out nash ranges, to create an unexploitable push/fold range ( * giving everybody calls optimal).

I could provide this . is it still needed?

sick value in these vids.

lol @ mia khalifa pic haha

ill try the trial tahnks

first off I do like the vid instead of the comment posted above: everybody needs to start somewhere how low the stakes maybe. :

at ~3;20 . 6s in position on 9d3dqs qd board. you check back the turn ip. given the 3bet raiser from the sb already checkt flop and turn. Do we not want to bet here. ofcourse reads factor in alot making this decision.

to make a more concrete; he would have bluffed the turn with all his air righ( no showdown value whatsoever). after 3betting having the aggresion . he would protect any 9s and qs combos. Given he must know that he is perceived as strong, he will probably also bet his strong flush/straight draws.

Since he elects to check the turn: would it be likely that he has any lower pocket. 22-44-55. (given he would fire a set on the flop/turn). maybe checking his total air suited connecter on a draw heavy board. ace,x hands and j,k.

so while writting this I start to realize that on these stakes. you are probably crushed on this turn alot , so I start to like the check way more haha. i ran it through equilab and . if he`s 3betting 10% . then you are dominated for this pot.

however since this does not factor in all resteales he would try to make , and given the fact that he checks twice its closer to wether you want to check or bet OOT.

good up the vids actually like em:). if you see the oppurtunity you could try and use a hud. just to see some general things where to pay more specific attention to regarding postflop play id like.

thanks

this seem like a classic donk bet , lets rule out what he does not have: a,a or 10,10 or 9s. also ak and aq he . all those hand in his range would have been a all in push I guess. I seem to have some troubles with openings up the Equitylab matrix for hand combo`s but I reckon you have at least 50% equity vs the other hands thus a call would have been pretty EV in this spot.

depends largely on ur villains since its a nash based ( equilibrium based chart). ofcourse if its a regular tournament you can fold at0 with 13/14 bbs in MP since a similar or better spot will pop up. but I think its vs tight calling ranges players an obvious Jam