Killuminati77
8 points
My main reason for make a lot of XR against this opponent is because they arent not goin to reponse correctly, he will have a hard time defending VS XR
May 8, 2019 | 2:37 p.m.
On my experience on the micro stakes this type of villain have a pretty unbalanced check back range, mostly pure air or weaks Kx (I don't expect this profile are checking back a hand like A2 imo, especially on flush draw boards) So against a check we can put a lot of pressure betting all the draws and less than J high, but the key on this probe bet strategy is some of the times I need to pull the trigger on the river to maximize the fold equity behind the missed cbet on the flop.
I have made a lot of preflop work, ranges adjusted to differents OR sizings, but for the simplicity of the post I have choose a tight defense range against a 3x OR. Why? because this type of players never made an OR to 2x and the aggro players tends to leverage the pot in all streets, this is the most tight escenario, if I face a lower sizing I just expand the defense to adapt.
Are you going for a full exploit (meaning no balancing or will you balance a bit in order to avoid what villain will notice what your doing and adapt)?
I have mostly played my hands on the zoom pools, and its very unlikely that villain have the chance to adapt to my exploitative strategy against him (If he is really paying attention to my strategy). When this happens I think you can go for his neck and block their trachea if you know what I mean ;)))
May 8, 2019 | 2:34 p.m.
Thank you KatonBond for your time, I agree with you to move hands like K5 from the XR to the XC range, this allow me to call down on the majority of run outs. Im not able to pay a solver yet and thats is the reason why I do a lot of paperwork (basically burn a lot of time) but I feel is the better tool that I have to improve my game for now, I play nearly 2mm hands over the past year on micros stakes on different sites, and I understand that the player pool have very specific tendencies, each player have an insane amount of explotative leaks, becuase of that I choose to make a profile of an LAG player, is not the most common especially on fast fold pools but I feel is more usefull that make a range based on my own toughts. I have created a NIT profile and I would like to see more comments to make more accurate ranges for the rest of profile players.
May 2, 2019 | 3:48 p.m.
Hello everyone.
In this thread I want to share how I build my ranges against flop continuation bet BB vs BTN, I'm going to simulate differents situations against differents opponents tendencies, my main goal is to open a discussion on how is the optimal way to adapt to the preflop aggressor strategy and what would be the best strategy to play on the turn take in to account the profile of each player. Let's start with the Villains stats:
Villain N°1 uses a very aggressive style, his VPIP 30 / PFR 25 / Cbet 70 / WWSF 51 and is likely to make larger bet sizes >66% pot.
I'm going to use two types of boards, where ones the nut advantage is for the preflop raiser and the other one is favorable to us, the boards types are: A♠ K♦ 5♠ & 9♠ 7♣ 5♦
Let's start with the scenario where villain N°1 has the positional and nut advantage on the board AK5. My first adjustment to this type of player is to tighten up my BB defense range, because I'm going to see the turn for a high price on average and it's going to be easy for the BTN to play against my projects because he is in position, also this allow us to take range advantage over him (see the equities of the ranges on the next section). This type of villain have a nearly 50% opening raise on average in the BTN, here is how it looks the opening range:
After make the adjustments, my defense range would be like:
Let's take a look on the equity for each ranges:
As you can see, my adjustment of tighten up my range of defense makes the effect of having 55% of equity on a board where the villain has the nut advantage (He still have all the nuts because I don't have KK+, AK on my range).
Now lets see the frequency of made hands for each ranges:
Villain has a top pair or better around 27% of the time (red box), on the opposite he has complete air 44.5% of the time (green box).
My defense range have a total air 33% of the time, wich avoid us to over fold on the flop and made hands of top pair or better 31% of the time.
Now assume that we are facing a bet of 66% of the pot on this flop, my main adjustment at this point is thighent up my check/call range and make a few check/raises, this is because the profile of the villain have the tendencies of put pressure of medium hands on later streets, so I want to keep my defense range with relative strong hands than normal. My check/call range is:
On the red boxes have the top pairs, orange is for second pairs where K6-K9 have the flush draw, the green is for QTdd a gutty + BDFD, pink is for medium FDs and yellow is for bottom pair + BDFD. I fold hands that the may seems like an easy call such like 75hh, QJo, JTo because I feel they are to weak to continue on aggressions on later streets and I dont going to see the river enough times to realize their equity.
Here is my check/raising range:
The red is for the value that includes TPTK+ and the green is for semi bluffs, QTss and second pair with FD and backdoor straight draw, we can go on the turn with the combo draws but if K4-K2 missed their BDSD we can check/call or check/fold (depends on the sizings) because we are going to see enough times the river with that draw after check/raising on the flop.
Now we are going to build the ranges for the flop 9♠ 7♣ 5♦. The equity of the ranges are:
On this board the equity gets so much closer, but the BB have slightly the range advantage.
The frequency of made hands for the BTN is:
The made hands of top pair or better are 20% of the total range and the air make a total of 24%.
The BB have a total frequency of made hands of 12%, but the air on his range is much lower than the BTN 17.4%.
Now assume that we are facing a bet of 66% of the pot on this flop, my main adjustment at this point is to make a wide range of check/raises because the villain is not going to respond optimally often, and I have all the nuts on my range.
On the check/call range I have the top pairs marked on red, the green are for guttys + overcards, the yellow is for mid and bottom pairs and finally the pink is for pairs + gutshots.
Here is the check/raise range the red is for value, TPTK, two pair, sets and straights and for the balance the bluff are made by the top of the setup (hands that make the highest straights possible like J8s, T8s and JTo.
So that is basically how I approach this kinds of spot, if I'm missing up some kind of approach or you have a different way to build the ranges on this spots let me know. Im going to create more spots against other player profiles and I would post later...
May 1, 2019 | 5:55 a.m.
It's been a while since I created this thread, so here is what happened on these couple months...
I improve my bank to play at NL25, the road has been long and tought since I started at NL2 but I feel very comfortable in the level, unfortunately the last month I run so bad that im running 30 buy ins below the EV line over 100k hands..
Here is the graph of the month of August NL25 and a bit of NL50
Position Stats
Im keep improving my game and playing I hope during the WCOOP the cards smile me again ;) I'm going to run as far as I can...
Sept. 4, 2018 | 3:47 a.m.
Thanks for the support guys, I be constantly update my progress over here, gl to all of us
July 6, 2018 | 9:06 p.m.
Good day to all who pass here to devote your time to read my thread
Almost 3 months ago I began to climb levels from nl2 with a bank of just $ 30, a curious fact is that when I started playing I had a down that took me to bustear because it is $ 6 just, never get to feel anger or any kind of injustice because I understand that it was perfectly normal, in my mind I told myself that mathematics is balanced in the long term (this applies to really serious samples) and I kept playing 90% and studying 10% until I got to where I am now that it is nl10, I have tried a few times nl25 and I feel pretty confident to win at that level. I play 5k daily hands (if my connection allows it) to 4 Zoom tables, this in the future I want to increase it to 6 Zoom tables but it will be when I understand the game better to increase the volume of hands played. My goal is to become the winner of nl100 / nl200 before the end of the year, I have to move my ass studying and playing but I have no problem doing it because it is what I want and where I am going, I invite you to follow me in this thread and I will accept any comment you want to leave me...
PS: If there is a player who wants to achieve the same goals, I am interested in setting up a study group with people who are fully committed to improving their game, not something that is half-hearted.
Here are the graphs and the Stats that I have left over these 3 months
Wich hands do you add to the XR range on this spot? To reach 15%-20% frequency...
May 9, 2019 | 2:22 p.m.