Kazeo59

Is there an option to remove weght of bet, check. to only have results in 100 or 0 %

what is the theory behind your blockbet, do you have 2 betsizes? do you have bluff for this size?

One more thing: Do we have to look at the equity vs their entire range or just vs their calling range?

I just had a spot where I got bet into on the river and I felt like vs their range I had a significant equity advantage whereas vs. their calling range if I raised, I would have very little equity.

this is because of the 1080p resolution, go to another video, change to 720p

HI Tyler, basically 2 things.

Last hand, You say you have 8 combos of value raises on the river being 79s and Q9s. Don't you think most of them are going to be check raised on the turn?
In fact i believe on wet boards PIO prefers check raising most of its immediate value hands, especially those that unblock their calling ranges and block their bluffs. In this case, how would you go at coming up with a solid GTOesque strat in regards to check call turn, check raise brick river? Would you rather use hands such as TT and 88?

Similar situation with an earlier BVB hand, the 98dd on JT8hhd vs Aces. It seems to be that youre assuming that on the river you still have all JT and 88, as well as Q9 and 79.
I once again think that PIO would fast play most of these on the flop? How many slowplays would actually be included in a GTO strat? If basically no slowplays take place, then we would have to bluff raise the flop alot. Which hands would we use?

I assume PIO prefers fastplaying wet boards because we still ahve lots of turns and rivers that protect our calling ranges. When both turn and river brick it is expected that we get rekt and we accept that?

Great vid Tyler.

How do you think would things change if it would be accounted for the fact that we not always lose vs raises, or they can bluff raise us, etc etc.?

Hey man great video. Very interesting hand with the A6s there and I decided to run it through PIO to check how good you played the hand versus the villain.

Even though this line gets played very rarely by the solver, I find out that you actually nailed it with your decisions. In the graph below you can see that the fraction of combo of A6s that gets to this node snap calls the 4b river jam, so mad props to you.

I believe that even though exploitatively people never bluff in this spot, it is important that when in doubt we stick to theory which I believe is what made you make this decision. Do you agree?

Also I would also like to get to this point where I intuitively understand what solver would to in spots that uniquely occur like this one. Did you run many simulations or is this intuition based through experience?

Best, Kazeo