JohnyC1337

"No videos found." :/

So far I have had 3 sessions with Thallo and I am definitely buying another pack of four lessons. I rly like the style of going through bunch of HHs and seeing what I could have played better. I play apps so I dont rly need to go in depth with bunch of solver work and know exactly what combos play x-y-z. I dont like spending 30 mins talking about one hand but rather go more briefly and just see different concepts over and over and learn from that. On the other hand I think If I would like to go in depth there would be any problem with that for Thallo imo. Everything is clear and well explained and during a session he always pays attention if I dont make again same mistakes which we talked about previously. If I do he brinks the concept again to make it even clearer. Also one big plus is that we always do more than 60 (paid) minutes! I love that :)

I´d like to see more explo stuff esp. how to play against fish. Preflop (for example what hands to add/cut to our RFI/CC/3B)+ postflop (for example different sizings other than solver would approve or different lines(mby more mergy)) exploits. I believe the biggest value gained is vs fishy players and there are not many vids explaining how to get the max of this value. Thx if this is happening :)

Hiho I bought a 10 hours package and now I am in the half of it. Without almost any 5c material available anywhere online this is probably one of the best places to get solid especially exploitative guideline of how to play 5c plo. In 5c plo there are bunch of multiway pots and you want to know how to play sets/2pairs/draws 5way and WhoIsNext will provide answers to those questions. I am glad to have such a coach who never says ok your time is over. We always go through all I want to know although its more than 60 mins which I appreciate!

how much ram is neccessary for HU postflop spots?

Can I get link to twitch channel pls?

1 - 3B 60%
2 - 3B 40%
3 - 3B 25%

3x fold

JJ fold
ATo call
99 fold

Lets simplify that so...

1-call
2-3B
3-call

0% rake fishy game = play loose (we have skill adv + low SQ %) or play tight (too many players call our opens)?

Thx

Is it more like your mental game of poker pack or Jared Tendler´s books?

You played quite tight because of high rake structure but I guess people massively underdefend their blinds on low limits so isnt better adjust to just minraise BTN about with 60%+ range? Btw. nice and entertaining vid:)

Thats great man! Rly looking forward to that. Gl

Hiho I am from Czech Republic so do we start today at 7pm? Will there be a record of the stream? I mean in past broadcast section. How long are you gonna stay in Prague?

I would be interested in knowing the price aswell

28:20 3.table

Hiho in spot where you get raised OTR and you called with T6 (villain turned Q8 into bluff) isnt it 100% polarized spot? What I mean by that is that he can have AQ which beats 100% of your range and you never got AQ. So insnt the right sizing just going allin? He can have then more bluffs. Correct me if I am wrong.

Cool vid :) I always wanted to ask why you dont almost never use that extremely popular 1/3 cbet strategy on dry boards in SRP. I have seen you use it on paired board but thats probably all. Is there a big difference in 6max and HU? Cause majority of 6max highstakes player do use it (vs BB spots SRP usually). I noticed you play more polarized style of play in these spots.

btw. what would be your bluffing range in spot where you didnt cbet 65s, turned flush and raised small turn stab?

Hi, great content! About 89s hand (5:00) - I thought that this hand is perfect example for raise T + give/up OTR on blank. I know that you have nice blockers, but do you have some hands which you are not shoving after raising the T? Thx! :)

Awesome answer thx!

Hi nice vid! I´d like to ask what do you thing about Nick Howard´s vids/opinion to this cbet 100% or cbet GTO problem? He says that we can gain more EV by just simplyfication which is important for humans so cbet 100% > GTO. Also I´d like to know if the EV of oop player would be higher when we use smaller sizing with our 100% cbet strategy comapre to 100% cbet strategy but with 1/2PSB. Rly interesting theme! Looking forward to see more vids from you.

Thx a lot man I was able to do it myself with your advice.

I´ve tried that but didnt help:/ My problem is this... http://n28i.imgup.net/Vstiek7550.PNG

Hi nice vid Nick! I´ve tried to do some agregation report but I got everything just in one column. Do I need more recent version of excel or mby the problem is somewhere in settings of PIO? dunno... Thx

Oki I got it. Thx a lot!

Ok so If I´d like to construct CO 4B Range where my value is QQ+,AK then I want to make jamming villain with JJ cca 0EV right? So again I put JJ vs my valuerange in combonator and use it in the excel and the result is quite similar (38% bluffrange).
But isnt flatting 4B with suited BW´s and connectors more common than jamming low pps/Axs? What I am trying to say is dont we want to have more bluffs than 38% in these situacions? (again bluffs realize eq when get flatted so we probably can have more bluffs dont we?). And if this is wrong and anyone with fold vs 5B higher than 38% is exploitable should we just 3b/5b him with low pps/Axs all day long? (I am not counting his re-adjusting in that case) Thx

Hallo Tyler excelent vid! I got a few questions. If I understand it well the optimal 4B bluff freq on BTN is about 37% of our hole 4B range (in case we are 4b/calling TT+,AQs+). By this freq villain is unnable to profitably ship TT vs our 4B. But what about scenarios when he desides to just flat and we realize eq with our bluffs? I always thought that value:bluff 4B ratio is about 50:50 so thats why I am asking about this.