Jeramae

that makes a lot of sense sir

my dilemma is knowing what part of equilibrium range should I fold (vs a x/r after we cbet 1/3 flop), by that i mean an equilibrium defense includes tp, 2p+, weaker pairs, draws, and backdoors, so which of these hands we should consider folding?

about the Fold more vs Raises adjustment that we need to make after we cbet 1/3 flop bc the population tendencies doesn't x/r high freq, what hands that are part of equilibrium defend should we fold? i mean an equilibrium defend includes tp, 2p+, overpairs, weaker pairs, backdoors, draws

also, regarding overfolding vs preflop 3b and 4b, a somewhat appropriate ft3b/ft4b is somewhere around 55%, so would you say we fold to around 60%?

i rewached How the Human Mind Approaches Poker Differently from Software and Francesco Lacriola strongly advise against diverging from equilibrium on the flop just based on assumptions because we are never sure what is an unknown villain doing on the flop and that he says it's a bigger mistake and we only gain a small edge if we're right

i think what im really trying to ask is:

is the ev we gain from correctly overfolding against unknown (bc we're exploiting population tendencies) outweighs the loss when we're wrong (bc without specific reads, we just dont know how our villain reacts vs 1/3 cbet e.g. he maybe correctly x/r, or overbluffs)