IturnTrader
6 points
I personally voted for a 4-player CAP, I do think RIO need to make the decision that at least creates some discomfort for pros. A 6 table cap is not far from what allot of people would play at a solid level which will defeat the purpose of trying to increase the quality of the games. If all of the pros are sure that a 4 table cap is too low then that is exactly what RIO should go with as it is indicative that you are actually affecting the quality of the pool.
A few have suggested on here going with a 6 cap and then switching to a 4 cap later if it appears to be the best choice for RIO. I would suggest that you should do it the other way around as you should aim to capture a good first impression with the recs rather than with pros. If you raise it to 6 later, all the pros that initially did not choose RIO will then give it a go anyway whilst there will be no difference in the attractiveness for recs based on that sort of change.
Really good video. You seem to be naturally good at explaining your thought patterns in a clear and concise manner. I honestly don't think you need to change the format and would look forward to a whole series of 200nl session review.
Sept. 16, 2018 | 11:03 a.m.