IIIIIIIlIlIlI

23:26 with the j8 did you go slightly smaller because you might want to raise some Ax and you wont have many bluffs?

36:19 with a9s shouldn't we expect the sb to generally be shoving the flop with his fds when hes that shallow? I feel like we aren't that worried about a diamond coming on the river because of that. He also might try to bluff with 56 or 54

Ty, do you have any tips on separating the fd boards between non fd when scripting? I tried to run 2 separate scripts but it doesnt put them in the same order so I have to manually put the second one in excel after.

One other thing I noticed is that pio usually likes to bet half pot when we're deeper in 4bet pots do you think 1/3 plays better in general still? Pio has AQ as 100% shove here anyways on turn with the half pot flop sizing since most his axs fds shove flop.

I ran this and it had half pot cb at 100% frequency

Ty,

I was thinking that as well at 100bb we would have to shove the turn and we would be getting less folds and thats a spot where not having Ad then blluff shoving turn might perform better even though they might normally shove Axdd on flop.

35:42 on the right do you think since this river is so good for our range that we should be betting less ever since villian can potentially start overfolding due to all of our bluffs getting there on the river?

40:42 on the left I have a problem with my ranges when I know having the Ad on flop/turn is good but then once we get to river we dont want to have it. I find myself underbluffing these spots. For example we want to be blocking villians continues on flop/turn but once we're at the river and the fd bricks we block some of his folding range. Do you usually just tripple in these types of spots? This spot can come up in 3bet pots as well when ranges are wider.

I see that your button strategy involves button flats and also 3 bets. I'm playing a 3b+fold strategy on the button and the simulations for that seem a little weird because my range is so wide - obviously need to check more when were 3betting more hands because our range is weaker

I feel like this might be a sign that the 3b range is too wide if I have to check this much across that many boards? I put a 3bet % of 15 so 3 more than what you put here.

Seems strange to check this much on low card boards when we're IP

Did you manually put A high dry, K high dry, Q high dry etc at the bottom? Or is there an easier way to do that?

I thought the same but realized the EV difference is tiny because we're playing vs an equilibrium strategy so the EV difference will always be minor.

Versus real opponents I think the EV difference might translate into much more since our opponents strategys are far from equilibrium

You can only win so much when your opponents strategy is just as good as yours

Hey,

That makes a ton of sense. I think I was struggling with splitting my ranges more in 3b pots because my range seemed way too face up. From what your saying it would make more sense to use one size in a 3b pot more frequently compared to a SRP. I don't have as many issues in SRP doing it because my range is less obvious and it feels more intuitive despite the game tree being bigger.

Also I plugged the 88 in you were right it mostly prefers a check but it will bet with the 8c. I've been way overbluffing these boards then. Think I was overestimating the range advantage and just going for 1/3 with range.

Thanks again

I just ran 3 aggregated reports one with a pot bet, one with a 2/3 bet, and one with a 1/3 bet on 9d 6d 3s.
EQR with pot bet is 98.8602, EV is 21.542
EQR with 2/3 is 98.6099, EV is 21.4874
EQR with 1/3 is 97.5903, EV is 21.2653
It seems like the EV/EQR of using different bet sizes is marginal but that seems suprising to me? Why do you think that is?

Ty for fast response

Thanks for that,

One other question at 42:34 table 2 you xb 88. Pio usually cbets range on these boards from ep/mp.

Do u think it would be better to bet with 88 from ep/mp and then construct more of a checking range from the button since our range is wider?

At 7min with QQ isn't this a standard spot to be betting range for 1/3? It seems like AA/KK are better candidates as well for this.

I think you said this opponent is fishy so it doesn't matter as much. Maybe you have a high probe stat on this opponent too?

At 5 mins you say hes risking 7.5

Isn't BB only risking 5? Needs to win 1bb back on average or folding is better?

Bet smaller on flop your range is merged. I would x KQ without spade, bet with spade.

Turn changes nothing and we're not struggling to find bluffs here so I would check.

flop is range bet for 1/3

turn is a bet because you picked up more bluffs on turn you will get called lighter (aq/qt/t9/fds)

13:55 Do you try to balance 2 bet sizes? Obviously doesn't matter vs weak opponent. I feel it's hard to construct ranges this way for me vs regulars.

For example if we 3b SB vs BTN flop is Qc7d8c I know I like to 2/3 instead of 1/3 because of the FD meaning I'll be checking more of my range (pio usually pots fd boards here)

If I add a 1/3 and a 2/3 sizing for example it gets more difficult to split range.