Harthor

The other day I was watching a TikTok video and was like a guy was into a girl, and the girl told him she's a lesbian, so he said "I can be a girl for you"

It was my only way to get into a dialogue with you

I was joking obviously, it didn't work for me cuz i suck, but seriously who are you GameTheory, I'm discussing with a friend you are nosebleeds stakes player and he says you probably are mid stakes player

Why do you believe in online poker still? imo solvers and people studying from solvers are pretty close to make it necessary a 0% rake for the games to be beatable. There's also real time advisors being sold. :(
For me personally it would be convenient if RIO launched a site, but I don't think you will be able to offer beatable games. (unless u make it 0% rake and win with publicity or something like that).
Stars strategy is taking into account online poker is done soon and they are just taking as much as they can before the end. All arguments by Negreanu are just from someone who works for the company.
It's pretty admirable Doug became Team Pokerstars and still talks honestly.

Gave up already on that though haha :) Thank you guys for responses

6:56 Top right QhT64h If you manage to defend that gg life and gg poker for me
15:42 Top left 100% 3b in sim, 100bbs, more than 100bbs I guess it's even more of a 3b
18:18 Top Right, I think It's a hand even oop u'd wanna always raise. Losing way too much value by not doing so.

Me too xD

6:35, you don't jam the nuts in order to gather some information, if you jam and he calls you with the nuts then you still gather the same information. I could see a point to avoid rake, but still seems like a shove to me.

If redraw was to a flush, then maybe it could be a low frecuency possibility but still a possibility, here I believe it's an easy check, based on having range and hand disadvantage. (Ur behind pair+fd).

On the last hand on the 3rd table AdKcJh3h board 4 way, when you say opponent must not call your turn probe, because it was multiway, doesn't the flop check behind of both players that go after him make their ranges pretty capped (so they fold pretty often there) that he's getting enough pot odds to play that riv well enough ip vs you? (maybe turning into bluff on A,K, or J river).
I'm asking mostly because you bet 50% of pot, I would agree on the fold vs a >=65%psb.
Thanks for making all these vids, I'm a big fan. All best.

Min 29:25 right table
I plugged Top 50 from vs25 (assuming you were raising top 50) , and put him on Top 16 from vs 25, assuming he was 3betting that aprox (from vs 25 is a list PloCalc developers made making each hand play against a range of top 25% if I understood it correctly).
There's almost no part of the equity distribution graph where he's ahead of you on that flop, so I'd say his flopcbet frecuency must be really low if any.
Taking that into account (and the cbet size is 50% and not like 10% wich would change everything obviously), I would raise hands a little stronger than this one, just because I don't see much hands to get value from.

In case I check oop, would fold this hand probably to a $4.25 bet into 5.85, probably call vs a smaller size than that.

As pIayed I prefer c/c considering 140bbs stacksizes pre, I would fold pre too. I see no reason to lead this board sb vs co.

haha I was wondering the same, I would like to know the rules to flag comments

Stacks are almost 400bbs at the start of the hand, I'd still would cbet smaller.

Yeah, it usually kinda turns on the alarm, or however you wanna call it, "if he's betting that small, then he must have a mid hand and his range is capped, then raise and barrel, or float and make him fold later on, but that's just psychological I think (or smth related to population tendencies).
I believe the evaluation should be made analysing range vs range, and it is likely oop has more equity there, but less nutted hands. If ip is raising too much to that microbet, then it becomes a really +ev option to microbet with top of range. (I wouldn't recommend such small bets ip on the flop tho, cuz then it's so much different, because of reopening the betting for oop).

Not sure if you are being serious with this comment. In case you are, then you are missing the case of bb having a higher bluff to value ratio on the turn than the river, (giving up to fire the river bet with some bluff combos).
Although it sounds more like you were making some inside joke. Or assumming BB has a boat 100% of the times.

http://www.propokertools.com/help/simulator_docs#rank , scrolling down there's a list of the rankings. Compared to pokerjuice's ranges, those are supposedly too much based on equity and too little on playability unless they changed it lately.

If villain is loose pre, I prefer expanding my value range towards more playable hands, and I would just flat pre with this one.
As played I prefer potcbet/stack off.

I would say J* folds on the flop.

KQJJ with two clubs is likely checking back the flop I think. I would 3bet pre too.

Flop range vs range:
-Who's range has higher ratio of KK / wrap flushes to the A?
Similar I'd say although I'm not sure, bu has less KK, cuz 3bets some KKds, but also less AA wich makes the KK that are still on the flatting range a higher % of total range. (Thats pure estimation, I actually wonder what's a right bu vpip vs a 16%UTG opening range, mine is usually around 16% with 2%-3% 3b )
-How valuable is position?
A lot, board seems pretty drawheavy, and also stacksizes are pretty deep (even better for ip)
-Equity range vs range, 51% for UTG assuming pokerjuice's ranges $FI15 and for button also $FI15 excluding top 2% (cuz those 3b).

*I would like to be corrected if my bu frequency preflop is off, I have no idea how to proceed in finding it, other than waiting until there's a plo solver.

Seems like a favourable spot for ip, I think in UTG's situation I would start off by checking my whole range most of the time.

When considering whether to raise a good hand or slowplay, it can be useful to go from a range vs range perspective and consider:

-Whose range has a higher ratio of nutted hands
-How relevant position is (The more volatile the board is, the better the situation is for the ip player)
-Equity range vs range (although at least in play, I find this the least useful of the 3).

Having more nutted hands, and position, usually compensates by far being underdog in equity and allows ip to having betting/raising ranges.

I'd say for most spots, if you have the absolute nuts, most of the times it's a raise/bet. The exceptions would happen when you make the evaluation range vs range, and you are at range disadvantage, wich would make villain more likely to bet future streets. (Likely to happen when you are on the big blind).

If on that board, you get the feeling you are gonna get a lot of folds, instead of not havign a rasing range, you could decrease the equity of the bluffs you pick. I would pick for example Ah9J.
I'd still wouldn't risk not raising with TT, because there's a lot of hands in UTGs range, that have to continue, that are worse.
I think it's worth noticing in Holdem usually ip checks top set, but that's to avoid/trap turn overbets from oop player, wich can't happen in plo.

On the flop I would just flat without any more info, would hate having to fold to a 3b, and Also would add to be cautious on making plays on unknown players who are nearly 200bbs, "and 3b small on the sb".
On the turn I would like to bet a little larger, or the potsize.
I don't see a bet/fold on the turn tho, as villain could jam lower 2p+draw. (considering villain small 3b on sb).
River I wouldn't risk villain not folding higher 2p, so I would check and realize whatever equity we have.

Preflop I'd 3b as you did (I believe AAss is good enough there), and flop I would either check/decide depending on villain's betting size, or bet something around 18% the pot size. If turn is a blank after flop going check-check, or microbet-call, I'd delay cbet or tcb.