GetFunkyTown

^ I would like to see an overbet there /w A6.

Props for river A4 hand SBvsBU (Q74 K 9), feel randomize ftw ;)

AA hand on JT5cc 2 4 we most likely prefer 125-133% OVB rather than 75% with strong Jx+.
Your intuitive range estimation seemed off (you made a slight hinch in game that J9o might be mixed for him calling river).

9Ts hand 3bp, very nice spot, I would like to see you compare equities for the range OTT,
also I'm interested to see if OOP donking % would change if you give IP larger bet size (50%/133% seems OK for 2bp, but not so for 3bp w 6 PSR).

I'd like to suggest that you attach PIO files so we can tweak it more easily and give better feedback (as we can assume most of us have decent PF ranges already so you shouldn't worry giving ranges away or something).

Also I'd like you to use more Strategy+EV function of PIO, to compare different node options simultaneously.

Cheers

Hey Hunter,

@PF, why do we prefer 85o>29s as weaker suited hands were 50% mix but we are calling twogappers at one of the hands ?

@31 I think a rec is not folding 50%+ 88/99d to a XR and also is def not folding QQ/JJ no diamond !

Also I tend to disagree with your conclusion that OOP leading range is merged and because of that IP is raising more vs the donk and overall IP equity is lower after OOP checks (OOP having more nuts compared to mergy <70% equity Kx hands)
Bringing up range explorer to compare the two exploitative locks for OOP donk would be cool. (as range distribution)
1st one was around 8% having a range covering all parts of the spectrum, having twopairs as well.
2nd one which is 70%+ is more polar, betting 60-70% of twopairs and X most of Tx,7x hands.
My point here is that IP range is weaker after OOP X, because OOP donking range is exploitatively tilted towards less equity hands (bluffs) because of IP overfolding vs the donk.

Cheers

Great minds talk about happiness being a combination between success and fulfilment. And rarely we can find fulfilment in ego driven competition, we may find great success that way, but it's not long lasting and sustainable, and more importantly it's not 'real' to us, because we're always comparing/judging ourselves to others.

Quote from Steve Siebold's Mental Toughness Secrets:

PLAYING TO WIN (highest paradigm)
An event awakens the performer and triggers inner wisdom.
Performer starts to see his/her performance as a game in which there
is no way to lose. Performer is driven by spirit instead of ego, devoid of pretense,
and totally focused. Fear does not exist at this level, only
love.

“I cannot fail, I can only learn and grow. The only person I’m competing
with is myself. I no longer feel fear, because it’s impossible for me to lose. I feel
so grateful just to have an opportunity to be the best I can be. I see my performance as the primary catalyst of my self-actualization. I don’t have to be who I’ve always been. I learn and I grow; that’s how I win.

Kasparov - Making mistakes in chess

Recommend reading Robert M. Pirsig's Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance