GPFTW

Hi Paul, I've got couple of questions regarding the AQJT hand at 38:30:
1) aren't we supposed to size on the turn only potsized, makes intuitively more sense.
2) solver seems to mix the river between folding and calling but i dont understand that it prefers to have 2 spades over 1 spade over 0 zero spade when deciding to call. What does make alot of sense me is that having the T is pretty bad, we much rather hold AQJ9 or AQJ8 when calling.

When/Will be able to do rivers as well?

20:30. Flatting AAQ6sssx BN vs UTG+MP1(shorty). I really dislike the flat here, we have a ton of FE pre vs UTG.
Also, we can get a ton of money in preflop vs a 100BB stack and a 40bb stacks, being IP.
In a small percentage of cases UTG will call and MP1 is jamming enabling us to jamm and get our stack in with potential 17BB dead money risking only 40!

I was shocked to see you flat here so could you expand a bit on your thought process?

Great vid as always!
10:00 :kk93ss openlimp: if we have a both open and limping range out of the SB, its seems KK93ss seem to fit in a limp-calling range quite well?
mediocre KK do very bad vs a 3bOOP and we have some deceptivness by limping our mediocre Kings would be my thinking?
Do i undervalue these KK, and maybe my thoughprocess is correct but these Kings are simple to strong? A hand like KK72ss, or KK67r would be better limp-calls?

Hey Phil, great breakdowns!

min 20: AdTs7d3s. I am curious what you think of villains turns checking range. If I was in villains shoes i would bet here very wide and quite merged,and to have 2 sizes makes most sense to me. One hand class that doesn't really fit in either a small- or a big betting range is a hand like SD+PP(88-JJ,=/>Qx), so hands like TT47,Q899 or 9957. Also, i think once villain checks the turn the field is vastly over check-folding, if i would be in your shoes I would be stabbing quite liberal.

Im wondering what you think about these thoughts.

Great video Richard!
I have a question regarding the 933r board breakdown in a 3bet pot OOP. I rewatched the part twice but correct me if im wrong. If we are holding a hand greater than AA and unblocking a T,9 or 8 we should be incentivized to bet smaller if my logic is correct. We want him to continue with these low equity hands instead of him folding those hands, which happen at a higher frequency when we are unblocking a T,9,8. So i really dont understand how our 33% sizing decreases once our range is >AA!(T,9,8) instead of AA:(T,9,8).
pls halp
rewatched it for the thirth time and you are saying because when we are unblocking a T,9 or 8 we increase the frequency of villain holding TT,9x, or 88. Im totally with you there, but then you go on explaining that thats why are increase our 67% betsizing because its targeting that part of villains range? this i dont understand, i thought this range is barely folding vs a 33% sizing and starts folding alot vs this bigger sizing?