Friendl7ire
15 points
uros19: 9h6d2d - its a quite dynamic board; so you have to split your range. In this case a higher betsize is favorable. Diego Ramirez made a fine vid about that.
March 22, 2017 | 5:17 p.m.
On this Board Texture Kh Td 2h oop has almost only Bluffcatchers in his Range. Would a higher betsize not be more useful to damage the amount of EV of this hands ?
Feb. 2, 2017 | 11:06 a.m.
Hi BigFiszh
Thanks for your answer. Have you seen Bens Video
http://www.runitonce.com/poker-training/videos/piosolver-analysis-akhh-on-kq2ssh-btn-v-2/
where he was c-betting his whole Range with a small betsize and realized that he was wrong.
That's why I'm still unclear about the situation I posted above. Equity and Equity Realisation are in both situations quite similar but the outcome is not the same. Can you say what factors lead to a complete different betsize and c-betfreq. ?
Feb. 2, 2017 | 9:43 a.m.
Hi
I got a hand simulation with an output from Pio I do not quite understand: IP 3bets with a very polarized range of 7.2% (some 76s,65s,54s and A5s-A2s) and gets called with a tight range of 3% (some AQ, AJs, JTs, 77-99). Flop is Kh Td 2h. Equity otf is a 50:50 split. Pio now wants to c-bet his entire range with a small besize. I do not get that: its like a toygame: Nuts n Air vs Bluffcatchers from oop. Why we don't split our range and choose a high betsize like 100% ?
Thanks a lot for bringing light into this one.
Stephan
Jan. 26, 2017 | 12:10 p.m.
Hi Ben, why do you cbet 1/3 pot on Table 2 (6:18) after 3betting the CO with AcTs on a Board Js 8c 2 c ? He's got probably an Equity Advantage what would make a potsize bet more suitable. Thanks a lot for all the great Videos !
Jan. 9, 2017 | 7:02 p.m.
Great Video. Builds a very solid Bridge from Pio to the daily Job on the felt. Thanks a lot and please keep on.
Great approach! Appreciate these kind öb Videos a lot!!
July 17, 2017 | 3:21 p.m.