Fatjoe8

100% agree. And I think this should be put out there publicly. To expand on what I said earlier, I have spoken with 4 very good mixed game and straight PLO players who played on the site...These are all very solid live winners and players I would even say are experts in their field of play. None of them show any sort of profit. All have expressed concern over the runouts once the money goes in and the number of chopped pots relative to the equity when the money goes in. I am going to have to consider this an expensive lesson on my part and a massive mistake in ever playing here.

Cory, I have been playing here and couldn't agree more. I get it that no one wants to hear bad beat stories, but the way I am losing hands or in many cases chopping pots is absurd. I have discussed this recently with multiple people (along with the same problem on PPP) and there is a consensus that, due to the game wanting to collect rake, the worst players will not go broke. I have been saving hands and runouts that just show how ludicrous things are. Again, I am not proposing I am getting bad beat a lot - it just goes beyond mere bad beat stories. The trend I notice is that the boards generate action - and specifically turn cards really are meant to get stacks in. And then somehow more than 80% of the pots I see are chopped on the run it time games. I have even experimented with slow playing alot more, and not going all in when I feel I'm 80%+ and in those spots, I still somehow lose to the wackiest runouts. Does this happen in real life sometimes? of course? But the general idea seems to be...max rake, max chopped pots, and don't let the fish go broke.

A common theme in all of your videos is that of checking your range OOP: What about a video or short series on leading your range? It seems if we are checking our range OOP 90%+ of the time, we can be exploited if we play against common opponents all the time right? Or disagree?

I don't understand your bet sizing on the 834 board. You do say you should bet bigger but what are the benefits to betting so small when there are a lot of bad turn cards? High run outs are favorable to you if they call the flop and you cover that - but to what degree are your sizings value related as opposed to protection related? and how value-heavy can you make your flop bets in a game where the turn changes equity distributions so much?

good stuff with Pio; would love to see an entire video on one very interesting hand and analyze the Pio actions with a ton of different run outs after the flop

In the QQ v J9 hand, if you're so far ahead of his range, why not a small 5 bet to either induce a shove from him or get him to commit more chips?