EvgenyOrel
15 points
Very nice video! Last hand (55). How u are recommend to play small pocket pairs (22-77) from middle-early position in small stakes mtts with 13-20bb stacks?
Is use Nash ranges is correct (for example,55 17bb deep with antes is Nash shove,but u make a fold)?
March 14, 2016 | 3:01 a.m.
Nice video!
On 16 minute, i think its good game frm Quentin73 to fold here a hands like 99-TT, even when he get such a great odds (over 26%). Cause vs QQ+ range he got over 18% equity, and i dont think we ever bluff in spot like this.
On 17-30, i think shove with AT with 10bb deep is standart here. Wondras is an agressive player, i think he open over 20% frm utg. So we stay good vs this range with AT. And if he folds,open shove with ATo here looks standart.
Aug. 9, 2014 | 12:07 p.m.
Very nice video!
Todd, when i watch video, i think K8o is standart call. Button is good reg, and would shove at least Nash range here, which 22+ Kx+ Q2s+ Q8o+ J6s+ J8o+ T7s+ T9o+ 97s+ 86s+ 76s. So K8o is good vs this range. But then i use icmizer for check this hand. I use mtt mode (31 player left, 12378 average stack).
If bu shove 48%, we can call 23% hands (offsuited king: KTo+). So its surprise for me, but looks like K8o is a fold here (K8o has -0.06)
As a hand KQ on BB. I think its close. If utg shove NASH range (44+,A7s+,A5s,A4s,ATo+,K9s+,KJo+,Q9s+,QJo,J9s+,T9s) KQ is call here. I think his range would little bit tighter (22+,ATs+,A5s-A2s,ATo+,KTs+,KJo+,QTs+,QJo,JTs). When i use icmizer (MTT mode. 32 players left. 12k av stack) - KQ is +ev call vs this range (+0.11). but i think fold is not mistake here. We cant use this soft when we play, and if spot looks like break even -i think its better to fold...
July 31, 2014 | 10:02 p.m.
Hi! Its final table of 180 man tourney.
Our opponent looks very agressive so far:
41vpip/33pfr (40% ep/100% (4/4)mp, 30% late position), but 3 bets only
frm SB (2/3 situations) till this hand. We has only 39 hands on him
Is top 7 of 180 man mtsng
Blinds 600/1200 ante 125
Hero (UTG): t34324
UTG+1: t28514
MP: t54606
CO: t26908
BTN: t40888
SB: t61802
BB: t22958
Pre Flop: Hero is UTG with Jd Jh
Hero raises to t2580, UTG+1 raises to t5000, 5 folds, Hero raises to t34199, UTG+1 calls t23514 all in
I use ICMIZER for this hand and thats is results:
1.If this opponent only 3 bet value range. and never fold to our 4 bet shove:
-vs 3% (AK+ JJ+) our 4 bet has -1.69%
-vs 5% (AQ+ 99+) our 4 bet has -0.17%
so we need for 3bet/call like 88+ AJs+ and our 4 bet shove with JJ will +ev
2.If this opponent has polarized 3 bet range, which include value hands
and hands with blockers to our 4 bet range (like QT,KQ) and will call
only value range:
- he 3 bet AK+ JJ+ (40 combos) on value, and QT-KQ (32 combos) for
bluff. and ofc call with AK+ JJ+ than our 4 bet shove with JJ will
break even (-0.02%)
As a result. what is correct play with JJ in this hand? is call vs 3 bet
is an option? And what is correct range, that we should 4 bet here?
Looks like KK+ is always +ev. but JJ-QQ is hard desicion..
July 30, 2014 | 2:13 a.m.
Very nice video, as often!
at 25 minute, buttom right table: good fold with 44. 20bb deep frm utg. what pairs u recomend to open in situation like this? 66+? 77+?
And another question: at loose-passive table, how u recommend to play pairs like 77,88 with 13-15bb deep? its better to just shove this middle pairs, if opponents around me looks like loose-passive callers, which 3 bets only nuts?
TY!
July 27, 2014 | 10:51 p.m.
Very nice series! Ty!
July 22, 2014 | 2:51 a.m.
Thank you!
July 19, 2014 | 10:44 a.m.
Very nice video!
30-00 i like his 3 bet jam with 88. You play agressive as a chip leader, and has wide utg range here.
So vs wide range his set mining is not so profitable, i think. And with 26 bbs 3 bet shove with 88 is profitable, if u open 16%+ here.No matter of ur call with. I think u open here up to 20%, so its good to shove 88..
31-19 J7s vs min3bet , 50bb deep. Dont u think its good to call this min 3 bet with such a good hands, even oop?
Thank you for nice video!
wow. enjoy this type of videos! more husngs please! very nice video!
Aug. 11, 2017 | 3:56 a.m.