capt
5 points
SB: $2.84 (Hero)
BB: $3.06
UTG: $2.20
MP: $2.00
CO: $4.83
March 24, 2019 | 1:01 a.m.
The vill had KJo
March 23, 2019 | 11:10 a.m.
No reads. thanks!
March 23, 2019 | 11:10 a.m.
thanks!
March 23, 2019 | 11:09 a.m.
SB: $2.01
BB: $2.52 (Hero)
UTG: $2.21
MP: $3.62
CO: $3.56
March 22, 2019 | 1:38 a.m.
Excelente aula, valeu Nico!
Oct. 25, 2018 | 3:06 p.m.
great video
Sept. 29, 2018 | 5:51 a.m.
Ive never seen a poker lesson like this before. Thank you for that hard work! Also reminded me of R projects at college haha
Sept. 14, 2018 | 3:25 a.m.
Hey gusmaa! It's nice to see you here.
In the KJs hand (~18:00) - Would have a overcalling range if you were KurtWSOP facing a shove by EP and a Call on the button? And also, don't you consider shoving worse PP (55, 66, for example) since button has a huge folding range when you shove?
June 14, 2018 | 9:47 p.m.
Yeah, I play mostly Full ring MTTs. Do you know why 6 max SD is lower? I thought it would be the opposite, since we have more multiway (and bigger) pots on full ring, which should mean more variance.
But maybe the fact that MTT are played mostly short stacked also contributed for this low SD.
Jan. 24, 2018 | 3:17 p.m.
Cool! I didn't know it was possible. Mine is 40 (in MTTs) :)
Jan. 23, 2018 | 6:08 p.m.
Great lesson! How do you estimate SD at 13:30?
Jan. 23, 2018 | 4:16 p.m.
14:00 - What do you think about 4betting KQo instead of flatting, since villain is aggro and we are OOP?
30:40 - Shouldn't you be using Chip EV when calculating not FT spots with ICMizer?
Great videos. Reviews are mostly boring and you make it very useful.
Dec. 29, 2017 | 8:22 a.m.
31:00 - Why you cannot flat ATo OTB vs CO range? I think we are crushing his opening range. Also, the SB and BB seems to be on the tigher side, although the SB is CL.
Love your videos! Hope you continue doing stuff like this!
Dec. 20, 2017 | 10:07 p.m.
Maybe a little late to comment in this video, but I really love this theoretical content, and I like the way you teach it.
About the steeper or flatter payouts questions (43:00), I had the opposite opinion about going wider in the first case. In my vision, since the payouts are steeper, the EV of call is very afected by the times we got 3rd position, which has a way worse payout than the 2nd one.
In the other hand, when we have flatter payouts, we have the atenuation of the ICM effect, so we can go wider. (Think the "flatterest" case where the payouts are all the same, i.e, we're playing chip ev, and then we can call so much wider).
Is that thought correct? What am I misunderstanding?
Nov. 11, 2017 | 1:40 a.m.
Hey man, nice video! I would like to ask you some questions:
1) 7:50/Table 2 - What you think is the best candidate to squeeze here? Do you prefer blocker hands (such as KQo, ATo) or the "bottom call" hands (such as 72s)?
2) What software do you use to organize your tables?
Oct. 26, 2017 | 9:04 a.m.
Hey clutch! Nice live sessions! I hope you do more stuff like this in the future.
2:00 - what do you think about jamming K8s pre flop, since buttons range is pretty wide and can't defend the minimum frequency against your shove?
Sept. 7, 2017 | 2:46 p.m.
Ok, let me see if I undestand it! 'g' is the frequency of chunck 1 in Part 1. And 'e' is 'equity of chunck 1' in Part 1. Am I right?
The villain had QQ.
March 24, 2019 | 12:01 p.m.