
Poker88
0 points
Can anyone help me how Sean comes to the follwing numbers (the math behind that)?
½ pot, Z = 25%
2x POT, Z = 40%
Ex. Hero bets river with {NUTS, BLUFFS} and Villain has {BLUFFCATCHERS}
Assume Hero’s river range (before betting) is {50 combos of NUTS, 50 combos of POTENTIAL BLUFFS}
At ½ POT, Hero reaches Z by bluffing 17 combos of his POTENTIAL BLUFFS
At 2x POT, HERO reaches Z by bluffing 33 combos of his POTENTIAL BLUFFS
-Thus, with the 2x POT sizing Hero can now bluff with 66,6% of the hands with which he needs to bluff in order to win the pot, vs. the ½ POT sizing that allows Hero to bluff with only 33.3% if these hands.
Dec. 30, 2014 | 12:33 a.m.
Good video again!
At min. 37 (at the blockers part) you mentioned that we need 30% equity to call the river. Can you explain this? I don't understand how you come at 30%.
Tnx!
Dec. 29, 2014 | 9:43 p.m.
Great video!
I like your series and the theory sounds good.
In all your videos you used very often the WWSF, WTSD en AGGR to evaluate the 'honestly' off players in river spots. You talk in terms like his 'WWSF is low', his 'AGGR is low' etc.
But what is in your opinion a low/normal/high frequency for this 3 stats. And what does it means?
Jan. 3, 2015 | 3:05 p.m.