AnaleGrande

enjoyed this one a lot, one question concerning the last hand: what would be good bluff raises for him then on the river? I guess QJ(4)? And merry christmas Cory!

The 2 means that you are 2nd in chips right now

I am actually pretty jealous, for a normal human being like me there is just no way to get access to a PLO5 solver with training function (it seems like software also has the training function) right now.

What is this software called? The simulation seems also far away from a fully converged state, I can’t believe that we have so much mix strategies in a lot of preflop spots.

Dude, you are slowly becoming a transcendental figure in the poker world, really like that. And no, you can't learn proper Chinese in year :).

Thanks Cory! I really enjoyed your analysis. What do you think about those poker apps in general? Do you also play on them? I am always hesitant to transfer any amount of money to those apps, because I heard a lot of bad stories about shady agents, cheating and collusion . What is your take on that?

You are right thank you, I thought it was Big Blind 100 initial raiser 50 BB and we on the Button 100 BB simulation.

Sounds plausible. And for 100 BB, what is your guess on the frequency and hand choices for stabbing in position?

Great video. One question regarding the AJ54 hand around minute 30: does our stabbing strategy change if the initial raiser also has 100 BB or less than 50 BB like 30 BB (in this case we might not call preflop)?

That was also my assumption, the hand is fine for a bluff, but we have to restrain ourselves to not go overboard with the frequencies. I actually thought our hand is pretty decent for a bluff, it blocks the top of his value range and does not block a lot of his assumed b/f on the river with medium flushes. Just one last question: In the shoes of our opponent, do we b/f or b/c here the river with his combo without any fh blocker and not blocking the nut flush?

QJT3 trip suited at the 25 min mark, why do we not consider to bluff shove this hand on the river? what are our bluffs then? the hand blocks very well the full houses and villian's range seems pretty much capped like Phil said, a lot of flushes

Okay, and how much should be this part of the range like? And what kind of additional components apart from the two pairs / set do they need? I guess atleast one additional high / straight flush blocker

Cory and MattC thank you very much for the discussion, very interesting to see your detailed thoughts on this spot.

Cory what should be c/r turn bet river villian's range here percentagewise? I would assume we have 3 main hand types here:

1. A-high flush / straight flush, basically everything he b/c or b/3bet on the river
2. mainly A-high flush blocker or other relevant blocker most likely b/f river here
3. 2nd or 3rd nut flush, they might go for a b/c or b/f on the river depending on the side cards (e.g. with 3 flush cards and the Queen-high flush he might opt for a b/c on the river)

Do you agree with the range and what percentage you would assign to each part?

When I first saw the last hand I thought you are bluffing with the best hand on the river, I can hardly believe, that he will go for b/f on the river with the nutflush for just one more additional bet after the used bet sequence. My guess is that he b/calls the nutflush and b/folds the blocker, so the raise is pointless vs this range. And all this although your applied bet sequence looks indeed incredible strong

Great video. Would you mind talking about what kind of rundowns you 3bet / squeeze in which position vs what action in your next video?
Thank you

Very interesting, I think this logic applies to a lot of situations where betting small with small showdown value with a relevant blocker versus a defined range is better than hoping for a miracle card on later streets

incredible how outdated this video seems, the solver cbets 10% here as the pfa

absolutely agree, the PLO content recently was subpar