Aha Okay
19 points
It’s amazing that you said mamamamama correctly that fast
April 12, 2018 | 1:27 p.m.
yea agreed vs 30% complete range, Im a nit and I defend 21% :( with that equity advantage seems reasonable :) and yes, agree with your last sentence 100% percent, Its just that opponent can c/r any backdoor FD less than pot sizing and you will have to fold 12% of lets say your 30% percent opening range, but if its not 100% cbet strategy then I was completely wrong. P.S. never posting comments while drunk again :D
Nov. 16, 2017 | 7:49 p.m.
turned it off after 1st hand flop. 1. You don't have nut advantage 2. You cannot cbet 100% frequency small sizing just because you would have nut advantage, you would need to use bigger sizings, at least half pot because you want to mix up your nuts with some bluffs, and 100% of range is not correct amount to do so, and your sizing tells you are cbeting 100% of your range and it is easily exploitable 3. KQTr hits you both similarly, opponents just has less sets, unless you have reads hes a monkey and completes wayyy too wide, and you dont. Sorry If I am being rude, dont mean to be
Nov. 15, 2017 | 1:28 a.m.
at 45min on table 2 hero check/folds bottom two pair to a cbet. is this standard? I am NLHE player, but it seems we are far ahead of opponent cbetting range,or am I wrong?
May 4, 2017 | 10:08 a.m.
we will welcome your money :)
Feb. 13, 2016 | 2:19 a.m.
Hello. Nice video! In second hand, on J76o flop, is it really correct to make statement that villain never cbet/folds? Or in other words, is it too cordinated of a flop to be having cbet/f range here with this SPR, because your hand conclusion was made based on that we have 0 fold equity. Thank you
Nov. 29, 2015 | 3:26 a.m.
looks like Zynga poker lol
May 11, 2014 | 12:30 a.m.
its really hard to keep up with what hands you are talking about after checking them with holdem resources, need visual reference of certain spots
March 17, 2014 | 11:39 p.m.
sunday - funday hehe, gl!
Feb. 16, 2014 | 3:56 p.m.
I think with 77 allin hand starting at 19:00 you overthinked a bit too much, i just dont see recreational (we defined that hes not a reg) players bluff jamming on that runout this deep in biggest buyin tourney of sunday. I put him on set all the way on turn and river, because a: i would not expect someone decent to stab with that sizing and b. i dont expect recreational player, who seems decent, go that far with his bluff and jam river. i may be wrong but im just saying in general, this kind of bluffs on that runout are just too rare to be calling of to catch them
Feb. 16, 2014 | 2:35 p.m.
explain me whats the difference between 4bet bluffing ranges, since we see flop 0% of times anyway, either he folds or 5bets/shoves lol. its all about table dynamics and picking spot not about cards. dont really understand your thinking
Feb. 16, 2014 | 2:09 p.m.
i guess thinking should be "looking at my table i have big edge postflop" factor, what i doubt is, that you need more than 1 double up to realize that postflop edge, so edge factor decreases while thinking about shoveing ranges, but my friend made a point that you should consider whole field and how people make mistakes on other tables, and that is the edge you gain too while shoveing tighter. So im a bit confused now
Feb. 9, 2014 | 3:27 p.m.
consider 55+ reg speed mtts
Feb. 9, 2014 | 3:20 p.m.
Hello. I would like to ask a pretty general question. Do correct cEV 10bb and less shoveing ranges apply to regular speed MTTs ? i mean those apply perfectly perfectly for 180 man sit n goes and turbo mtts, are regular speed mtts diferent ? in a vacuum, they should apply the same way, but i often see good regs nit up once they get down to 10bb and lower stack in regular speed mtts
About K98ss flop 3bettting OOP, Dont you think if you gave 1/3rd pot bet option for IP player on turn it would show very different strategy for 3bettor? because thats what players often do IP
Aug. 9, 2018 | 11:18 a.m.