7even2euc3
12 points
Hi Steve, I'm using PT4. Do you know if PT4 calculates river call efficiency correctly? Also, is the breakeven point = 1 ? Thanks.
April 11, 2015 | 1:28 p.m.
Do I understand this correctly? You are defending half of your button opening range as standard vs an almost 4x 3Bet? Or you do this VS this particular player because he's 3Betting a lot from SB? He's overall 3Bet doesn't look like he's a crazy 3Bettor. Thanks!
March 24, 2015 | 11:30 p.m.
It's in the replayer at the end. It looks like he triple barelled and got called by the nutflush. Nothing interesting :). Good video by the way.
March 10, 2015 | 11:59 p.m.
Could holbcn be right if what he said is exactly jinmay's thinking process? Sometimes we can assume how most of the regs will think in spots (mostly at lower stakes than this) so shouldn't we bluff close to zero percent in this spot after taking this line? What I mean is, if he doesn't think at your level (and you say a couple of times that you don't know exactly what he's doing and how he thinks) is this bluff bad ?
March 8, 2015 | 12:50 p.m.
Indeed, makes sense, but I didn't realize that 1.5-2% makes the difference here. Thanks again.
March 8, 2015 | 1:18 a.m.
Thanks kaytor. This might be the reasoning but is this such a big difference? The result I'm getting in Flopzilla by switching the 5 with a 6 is a max of six combos difference. So we're getting called 1% less when we have a 6 in our hand. And that's assuming that he only calls PF with any suited A6, K6 & 96 which of course can be wrong depending on how he constructs his 3Bet range. What am I missing ?
March 7, 2015 | 5:14 p.m.
Hey Ben, very good video. Took me about two hours to watch it and understand some of the things :). There's one thing I don't really understand and don't even know where to start.
Min 33:50 you're on the RV oop BvB w/85s on 9KA-T-6 board after C-betting FL and TN goes X/X and you say that 8-high is a marginal bluff but a pair of 6's with a weak kicker is the hand that you always want to bluff here. Why? What makes it such a big difference?
Thanks!
March 7, 2015 | 3:09 a.m.
Anything new about those PokerTracker Premium Add-on ?
After a little bit of research it seems that PT4 does do it correctly and the breakeven point is indeed 1. It is calculated only for hands when hero either called a bet or check>called a bet on the river and accounts correctly for split pots (doesn't take in consideration pots where hero bet>called).
Also, the total RCE is not obtained as an average of all individual RCEs because the result would be wrong in most cases. It is calculated as BigFiszh said by summing up total winnings and dividing them by our total investment.
April 13, 2015 | 12:09 a.m.