Out Now
×

$50k PPC: The Final Table

Posted by

You’re watching:

$50k PPC: The Final Table

user avatar

Zachary Freeman

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$50k PPC: The Final Table

user avatar

Zachary Freeman

POSTED Mar 10, 2025

Zach Freeman continues his review of one of the most coveted tournaments of the year in the $50k PPC and picks up the action at the unofficial final table.

Footage provided by PokerGO. Sign up to watch more great content here.

3 Comments

Loading 3 Comments...

mx404 22 days ago

Wow the length! What a treat, thanks for the longer review Zach!

@rio team - the title is missing a k from "$50k PPC"

SoundSpeed 21 days ago

Outstanding review!

25:40 would you 3bet this hand if you were deep?

What makes good semibluff 3bet hand in nl2-7? Super premium 1 card 7 and 8 draws only? Are bluffs 2pr and trips?

57:15 I am surprised to see becker fold the 3 flush with two low cards assuming most of his hand was live. Would you open it if one of your upcards was a low card instead of the Q?

1:13:05 so if benyamine had drawn would ivey have bluffed?

1:19:20 you said you didn't like yockeys call with 632. Does it matter that he had an extra 3?

1:32:10 with everyone checking after the second draw could benyamine pat his J? I know hu the J is a favorite over a one card draw with one draw left but not sure if he is a favorite over two one card draws.

Thanks!

Zachary Freeman 21 days ago

Thanks very much. You guys have loyally been following these. I appreciate it.
1. No. I cant think of any scenario that this hand would be a 3bet vs the opening position Becker was in. Its not a pat hand, its just a mediocre draw to a 98. Its never a fold, never a 3b, always a call.
2. The most common semi bluffs will be our best draws and linearly move down from there. I haven't incorporated this but I would imagine some of our draws that are just barely too weak to call can be low freq semi bluff 3bets. Maybe something like a T654K on CO vs HJ for example? Thats just a guess at what a solver would dictate.
3. This fold is essentially mandatory in this case and still a fold even if things were more attractive. As is, he has a Q door and it will be obvious he is going high. But he doesn't even have a high hand, he just has a draw. Even split Qs here would be a fold with 3 wheel cards behind and, most importantly, one of them being an Ace along with the other door card being a K with the possibility of facing split Ks. Even with the Q down, this hand is a fold facing those opposing doors.
4. Yes.
5. The extra 3 helps very mildly but vs utg6 its a fold still.
6. You essentially never would pat a J7642. For one, you forfeit the EV of betting and raising rivers when you make a strong hand. But also, the 7642 part is often the best draw, and nearly always at least the 2nd best draw and 3-way that will not only have highest EV drawing but highest equity as well.

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy