Hi Chris great video! (Thank god for the 6 tables!)
Couple of question
@20:00 KK before the btn flatted you considered to slow play KK. I most of the time think that people from UTG have their stronger range to call 20bb shoves and most loose villain are more Ax heavy in this spots making KK a little vulnerable and lose action against a hand like AQ in no Axx boards. What factors you take in account when slow playing? RF and agroo of the opponnet?
@28:00 Q9s flat against CO. Your game plan in this spot for SB this deep flats a ton OOP something like 22+ J8s+ and 3b only premium? Im always unsure about my SB strategy. At what stack deep you start to flat less SB?
@29:00 AJo in this spot (I play much lower stakes) if I had the read I tend to float very wide against certain players and bet almost any turn they check and fold against the more nitty population. Is working fine so far but maybe in more higher stakes this is a leak? Can I hear your opinion in this spot plz.
I hope you can make a couple of theory videos in the future but I def enjoy this type of live play records. Sounds really interesting the 25k review.
20:00- The fact that villains range is stronger from UTG doesnt mean shoving KK is automatically better. It's not as if the range of hands that calls vs a 20bb rejam is always 7%, thus when you shove vs a UTG 14% open you get called 1/2 of the time and when you shove vs a btn 49% open you get called 1/7th of the time.Villain also has to take into account where you're shoving from etc. There's a ton of stuff to take into account when slowplaying. Stacks of opener, ICM, stacks behind, field tendencies, villain specific tendencies etc just to name a few.
28:00: You definitely don't employ a strat in SB that looks like 3b top 5%, flat 15%-5%, fold 85%. There's a ton of mixing going on. I know that how much you flat SB fluctuates w/ stack depth but it doesn't follow a trend of "flat more until you reach x stack depth and then 3b more until you get to stack depth y where you pure 3b".
29:00:- I don't really know what you want me to say about this spot. Obviously our strat can't be just call every flop bet and stab when they check and fold if they continue betting (and you're aware of this since you seem to note you're exploiting population in your post). If what you're doing is working, great, keep doing it I guess. But it's pretty safe to say you can't play high stakes poker and just always call flop with a plan to stab turns
@19:53 you said the squeeze is too small but given the effective with stacks it should be fine I guess, and we´ll be playing a 1.5 spr mostly likely three way. So we´re peeling all of our suited opens here, right?
I really like live videos and you can mix with some review, or some theory.
Thx and keep the good work.
As I said in the video afterwards, I think it's a bit small but its not insanely small. He should probably get an extra blind in there or something like that.
Probably not all suited hands peel. Disconnected shitty suited hands will probably still find folds (like Q7s or something). Getting backraised is still a real concerned here at some freq.
yeah, this seems loose to me.
We have not so great eq v reasonable squeezing ranges in the first place (maybe 33% against the squeezer? less? ~24%? in the multiway scenario) and we block some lighter 3bs that I think some people will choose. disc- i don't play tournaments really and don't know this player or have a firm grasp of how the average tournament reg designs his range.
our relative position has to really impede our eq realization postflop when ip peels. Like, what do we do if ip calls and we face a cb from the squeezer on K94 rb? Q85?
thanks for the video!
my suggestion would be some kind of pio video series, i liked the one about flop check raises a lot, which was about a year ago
would love to see some SBvsIP single raised pots at different stack sizes/positions or SBvsBB play
Okay cool, there are a few more parts to this series that are set to be released and then I have to make something else so I'll consider this as a possible option to follow up this series!
13:15 " - AQo on the river- can we bluff here sometimes? he have Tx 6x Jx, 89 78 , flushdraws and QK Q9. He dont bet river (less likly flush) and the 70% cbet makes our range stronger . maybe we can fold 6x Tx. What do u think? What size if you like?
Well I mean you can whatever you want. If you think he's going to fold a bunch then go ahead and bluff.
I don't think bluffing AQo on river is balanced. I still have weaker hands (KQ/K9s etc) and I have other hands like this one w/ a club that are going to perform better etc.
Loading 11 Comments...
Hi Chris great video! (Thank god for the 6 tables!)
Couple of question
@20:00 KK before the btn flatted you considered to slow play KK. I most of the time think that people from UTG have their stronger range to call 20bb shoves and most loose villain are more Ax heavy in this spots making KK a little vulnerable and lose action against a hand like AQ in no Axx boards. What factors you take in account when slow playing? RF and agroo of the opponnet?
@28:00 Q9s flat against CO. Your game plan in this spot for SB this deep flats a ton OOP something like 22+ J8s+ and 3b only premium? Im always unsure about my SB strategy. At what stack deep you start to flat less SB?
@29:00 AJo in this spot (I play much lower stakes) if I had the read I tend to float very wide against certain players and bet almost any turn they check and fold against the more nitty population. Is working fine so far but maybe in more higher stakes this is a leak? Can I hear your opinion in this spot plz.
I hope you can make a couple of theory videos in the future but I def enjoy this type of live play records. Sounds really interesting the 25k review.
Thank you very much for your great work!
20:00- The fact that villains range is stronger from UTG doesnt mean shoving KK is automatically better. It's not as if the range of hands that calls vs a 20bb rejam is always 7%, thus when you shove vs a UTG 14% open you get called 1/2 of the time and when you shove vs a btn 49% open you get called 1/7th of the time.Villain also has to take into account where you're shoving from etc. There's a ton of stuff to take into account when slowplaying. Stacks of opener, ICM, stacks behind, field tendencies, villain specific tendencies etc just to name a few.
28:00: You definitely don't employ a strat in SB that looks like 3b top 5%, flat 15%-5%, fold 85%. There's a ton of mixing going on. I know that how much you flat SB fluctuates w/ stack depth but it doesn't follow a trend of "flat more until you reach x stack depth and then 3b more until you get to stack depth y where you pure 3b".
29:00:- I don't really know what you want me to say about this spot. Obviously our strat can't be just call every flop bet and stab when they check and fold if they continue betting (and you're aware of this since you seem to note you're exploiting population in your post). If what you're doing is working, great, keep doing it I guess. But it's pretty safe to say you can't play high stakes poker and just always call flop with a plan to stab turns
Thanks Chris gl in the 100K
@19:53 you said the squeeze is too small but given the effective with stacks it should be fine I guess, and we´ll be playing a 1.5 spr mostly likely three way. So we´re peeling all of our suited opens here, right?
I really like live videos and you can mix with some review, or some theory.
Thx and keep the good work.
As I said in the video afterwards, I think it's a bit small but its not insanely small. He should probably get an extra blind in there or something like that.
Probably not all suited hands peel. Disconnected shitty suited hands will probably still find folds (like Q7s or something). Getting backraised is still a real concerned here at some freq.
yeah, this seems loose to me.
We have not so great eq v reasonable squeezing ranges in the first place (maybe 33% against the squeezer? less? ~24%? in the multiway scenario) and we block some lighter 3bs that I think some people will choose. disc- i don't play tournaments really and don't know this player or have a firm grasp of how the average tournament reg designs his range.
our relative position has to really impede our eq realization postflop when ip peels. Like, what do we do if ip calls and we face a cb from the squeezer on K94 rb? Q85?
thanks for the video!
my suggestion would be some kind of pio video series, i liked the one about flop check raises a lot, which was about a year ago
would love to see some SBvsIP single raised pots at different stack sizes/positions or SBvsBB play
Okay cool, there are a few more parts to this series that are set to be released and then I have to make something else so I'll consider this as a possible option to follow up this series!
Thanks for your input.
13:15 " - AQo on the river- can we bluff here sometimes? he have Tx 6x Jx, 89 78 , flushdraws and QK Q9. He dont bet river (less likly flush) and the 70% cbet makes our range stronger . maybe we can fold 6x Tx. What do u think? What size if you like?
Well I mean you can whatever you want. If you think he's going to fold a bunch then go ahead and bluff.
I don't think bluffing AQo on river is balanced. I still have weaker hands (KQ/K9s etc) and I have other hands like this one w/ a club that are going to perform better etc.
i think is nice the party and stars stuff
We can learn and play without them
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.