Out Now
×

WCOOP $1k 6-Max (part 4)

Posted by

You’re watching:

WCOOP $1k 6-Max (part 4)

user avatar

Dylan Linde

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

WCOOP $1k 6-Max (part 4)

user avatar

Dylan Linde

POSTED Dec 17, 2015

Dylan resumes the action with a mound of chips and two tables reamining in the WCOOP $1k 6-max event.

2 Comments

Loading 2 Comments...

chasepoker 9 years, 3 months ago

Enjoyed the video and the series in general.

Quick question at 37 mins you touch on sizings with variable stacks behind. In general i normally size to the largest stacks if i will be oop to them but have no basis for this other than it feels right any thoughts on this idea from a more theoretical/math based angle?

Example : If my standard is 2x vs 20-30bb stacks and 2.5x vs 30-50bb stacks and 3x for 50-100bb ( just an example) and not counting sizing based on position ( ie larger with stronger a range from earlier position etc..). Here if I was utg with 100bb I and had all 35bb stacks except for button who had 100bb and a bb who had 20bb I would move towards the 3bb open ( when multitabling more likely just hit 3x).

This question seems very open and I know it is most likely a mixture of alot of different factors and so to make it easier to reply to.

1)Do you think it is correct to size to the largest stack or an average of those behind?

2)If you size to the larger stack does them being in/out of position count strongly as one of the variables.

I feel like I am rambling but I hope you get my point.

Thanks
Rich

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy