6:25 with the turn completing straights should this be a turn overbet or should we be sizing down to allow us to get value with a wider rng in a spot where I would think eq runs close?
This hand and the AT hand before it, I know the bluff hand has cards that give it some eq and blockers but at the same time those cards also block the fold rng. Those cards are simutaneously good and bad to bluff with. How do you determine which way to go? Randomize?
7:20 q4 should we jam river?
10:00 seems like river bet was too small with a straight and flush blocker. Psb-150%?
11:50 hands like these when we semibluff raise turn and river bricks are generally giveups on brick rivers correct? I know we block some of the folding rng. However our opponent will have more high single heart hands which we unblock which make me want to follow through river.
32:40 do you feel opponent should have cc turn rather than cr? He would be missing value from pr plus draws, wheels, sets and 2prs. If he does cc turn, even on blank rivers he is just playing a cc line it seems.
Yep, 92s was definitely a rec and totally fooled the reg. I think it's a good lesson to point out that if you have trips -- the other guy is probably doesn't.
On AJ on AKT -- I think either sizing is probably okay -- this isn't the key value region in range It's more important to construct the two pair+ bluff range here. If you go smaller you can value-bet thinner, but you also get put in more tricky spots like this guy who sensed weakness.
On blockers to fold range and equity -- I think you need deeper analysis of board texture -- like having the Ad in the A Td hand -- definitely cuts bet/calling ranges, but the Td probably actually blocks slightly more folds.
With Q4cc, you have to be careful not to value cut yourself too badly, when you have QJo, It might be a jam against button but as ranges get tighter -- we essentially duplicate the calling range, so getting mainly called by chops is actually quite bad.
On Jd9c, he's actually repping roughly the right amount of value with a low-flush. If you look at a PIO sim the Axdd, Kxdd regions are generally the only regions that want to get 100bbs in. Practically it might make sense to bet slightly bigger, just because he's going to get rebluffed here a healthy bit from Adx.
It's probably a follow through with 98h, but you have to be really careful here not to over do it. It's super easy to find bluffs on these boards with 6 times as many single hearts as flushes.
With 86cc, I haven't looked, but my guess is that he doesn't have 90% equity vs my range -- (this is the usually threshold for raisiing). It could change of course, if I construct the range to be too bluff/flush-draw heavy but knowing how I approach the game, I think that's doubtful.
Loading 2 Comments...
Excellent, informative video Tyler!
1:00 seems way out of line.
6:25 with the turn completing straights should this be a turn overbet or should we be sizing down to allow us to get value with a wider rng in a spot where I would think eq runs close?
This hand and the AT hand before it, I know the bluff hand has cards that give it some eq and blockers but at the same time those cards also block the fold rng. Those cards are simutaneously good and bad to bluff with. How do you determine which way to go? Randomize?
7:20 q4 should we jam river?
10:00 seems like river bet was too small with a straight and flush blocker. Psb-150%?
11:50 hands like these when we semibluff raise turn and river bricks are generally giveups on brick rivers correct? I know we block some of the folding rng. However our opponent will have more high single heart hands which we unblock which make me want to follow through river.
32:40 do you feel opponent should have cc turn rather than cr? He would be missing value from pr plus draws, wheels, sets and 2prs. If he does cc turn, even on blank rivers he is just playing a cc line it seems.
Thanks!
Yep, 92s was definitely a rec and totally fooled the reg. I think it's a good lesson to point out that if you have trips -- the other guy is probably doesn't.
On AJ on AKT -- I think either sizing is probably okay -- this isn't the key value region in range It's more important to construct the two pair+ bluff range here. If you go smaller you can value-bet thinner, but you also get put in more tricky spots like this guy who sensed weakness.
On blockers to fold range and equity -- I think you need deeper analysis of board texture -- like having the Ad in the A Td hand -- definitely cuts bet/calling ranges, but the Td probably actually blocks slightly more folds.
With Q4cc, you have to be careful not to value cut yourself too badly, when you have QJo, It might be a jam against button but as ranges get tighter -- we essentially duplicate the calling range, so getting mainly called by chops is actually quite bad.
On Jd9c, he's actually repping roughly the right amount of value with a low-flush. If you look at a PIO sim the Axdd, Kxdd regions are generally the only regions that want to get 100bbs in. Practically it might make sense to bet slightly bigger, just because he's going to get rebluffed here a healthy bit from Adx.
It's probably a follow through with 98h, but you have to be really careful here not to over do it. It's super easy to find bluffs on these boards with 6 times as many single hearts as flushes.
With 86cc, I haven't looked, but my guess is that he doesn't have 90% equity vs my range -- (this is the usually threshold for raisiing). It could change of course, if I construct the range to be too bluff/flush-draw heavy but knowing how I approach the game, I think that's doubtful.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.