Thanks FunkyMonkey appreciate the love!

Thanks for you feedback. I agree about the Q5 hand. It's probably going to be close to indifferent, because they are definitely finding the bluffs here.

Thank you for your comment! I think it's a small effect. It's only 3-combos and it's hard to find regions that don't interact with some part of the bluffing range that still have reasonable equity against top pair. 22 doesn't interact with anything, but it has lousy equity against region with every gutshot having 40% equity and every unpaired hand having 28%. We need to balance these two ideas when we consider which hands to call.

I don't think you should focus on what happens when the villain has small ranges of crazy good draws. Like those 3 combos comprise about 7% of the range. I'd prefer to make a tough decision for the median hand rather than a premium draw.

On this hand though AK on KJ63ss board. The turn is usually small bet or big bet / overbet so like 33-90-150? Just curious if you chose the small bet because villain was short stack.

Him being a shortstacker moves sizing down, because I don't have to worry as much about implied odds. If he sucks out-- who cares, he wins 50bbs or something after paying 22.

I'm sure overbet has to be a part of computer type strategy here, but in practice I think it leaves the small bets vulnerable and often flips over our hand. It's easy to remember to overbet good hands and harder to remember to hit the mixed bluffs.

If you think about as individual whose making mistakes, then of course not. I'll never be able to exploit X player in the pool making some specific mistake.

The main issue I have with this idea is that whenever I play 1/2 I see these mistakes, so it's not a person, it's the population. Post a hand in microstakes with the 3rd nuts against a river jam and ask them if they should fold and you'll get people who consistently say yes. This sort of thinking inevitability leads to a ton of spots where range is comprised mainly of weak hands and all of those hands are being folded. Take the AQ vs Q9o hand for example -- he's peeling so loose preflop that Q9o is in the top 15% of hands on the turn and he's folding. Those spots happen everyday if you can correctly find them by paying attention to stack-sizes,raise sizes and flop sizings, you'll find lucrative opportunities.

Thanks Lono! Some 2/5 zone, I like the hands per hour. But most of my volume is at 5/10.

I think they're fine/good. It's a little nitty to check here against fish. Basically against regs, I get concerned that they will soul read me as QJo,KJo, KQo when I bet turn, so it makes more likely to check the regions. C-R is good/fine but you have to pay attention to betsizings because especially against overbet it's likely going to be money loser as a c-r.

I was exaggerating a little bit with 98s here vs a CO minraise. Generally, 98s is the worse performing suited connector because its straights aren't nearly as valuable as something like 76s, basically on JT7 or QJT, our equity is good but not as commanding as 76 on 985 or T98 because our opponent simply has more offsuit combos with suckout equity. Additionally 98 on 98x is a weaker hand than 76 on 76x because of the extra straight draws from our opponents (JTo vs 98s). The solver generally likes to avoid the combo because these reasons.

Ignition allows you to see the holecards the day after.

Thank you!

Something different, I don't think it matters too much unless the raise size is really big. If it's really big, we just can't raise that many hands and we're going to miss profitable opportunities.