Trend Spotting: Introduction
Posted by Krzysztof Slaski
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 15 Comments...
Pretty compelling idea and well executed
Thank you!
Probably just include a three-bet scenario where small blind has the range advantage as counterpoint since you covered IP and OOP in the theory portion.
>
Very interesting video for sure. My suggestion would be to spend more time on real scenarios in the next videos since you already covered the basic model and idea in this one :).
So every video is going to cover different variables, but I can definitely spend more time on real scenario examples. Potentially cut every variable into 2 parts.
Thanks for the feedback
Very excited to see more of these. Well done.
Very helpful!
I think this was a great video and delved into why pio outputs are the way they are and why they change with even subtle differences in range. Looking forward to more.
On a side note, I always get a lot out of your content but this video felt strangely sad and empty with the lion gone :(
without lion it is not same....
Hahaha
I moved recently, and just haven't hung the lion back up. He will be back guys don't panic
Great concept, Krzysztof Slaski - Sort of like a bridge between toy games and actual poker. I look forward to the next one!
Hi, I just found this series, really look forward to watching future parts. One thing that doesn't make any sense to me though. As IP range got stronger the over bet frequency kept increasing. However OOP overbet frequency peaked at 30 then started decreasing as range got stronger. This seems like a very interesting meme, I hope you can help me understand.
Hey,
Yeah it's pretty interesting that this happens. I think the reason for it is that once OOP decides he doesn't need a checking range, that 3/4pot bet gets played back at a little more frequently, since it's weaker, and a bunch of the hands become indifferent between the 3/4 and overbet.
Hey, this was a great one ! Im the kind of player who prefers theorical vid rather than practical content.
I know you made your video for a moment now, so I m not going to ask question related directly to the video.
I dont understand why IP and OOP sometimes use bigger sizing instead of geometric size . Why it would gain more ev to not follow geometric size in 3 street and instead use a (bigger) non geometric sizing on 1 or 2 streets ? It is only for "protection" issue ?
I may misunderstood something basic here.
Cheers.
You variously describe a player’s range advantage in terms of “EV” & “equity.” The former is not helpful; it is a consequence of the player’s strategy, not a cause of it. One can’t look at a board and set of ranges and identify “EV advantage” unless one knows the optimal strategy that produced the advantage; accordingly, one can’t use “EV advantage” to identify the strategy. Equity advantage and position determine the strategy. So you should characterize the analyzed boards that way only.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.