Hi Teunuss, I'm quite surprised by the high c-betting strategy for IP on the 975 board, is it because the board isn't connected enough? Or is OOP just going to miss this board to much?
Great video, teunuss , and excellent decision sticking to more interesting hands that can be productively analyzed, as opposed to just picking the biggest or most exciting ones. That last hand was especially interesting. Do you know anything more about when we might want to continue betting our paired hand when the turn brings an overcard? I understand the concept that if it is really good for our range we can bet it nearly 100%, similar to why we can cbet some boards near 100%, but I am really curious now about how often this type of situation occurs and how often I am blindly checking back my middle pair because I don't yet know how to think properly. Any insight or advice you may have is much appreciated.
Thanks!
Try to estimate in these situations: In which line will our EV be the highest?
It can be possible that checking is very good, when you expect villain to overbluff the river.
Betting can be good in a situation like the A9 hand of llinus, where villains range is mostly pair+draw and pure high equity draws, where we can easily bet/call it off vs an agressive opponent, whether against a more passive opponent who isn't bluffing much on the river and not check shoving much on the turn bet/fold is the best play.
Hope this style of thinking helps a bit ;)
Loading 17 Comments...
Hi Teunuss, I'm quite surprised by the high c-betting strategy for IP on the 975 board, is it because the board isn't connected enough? Or is OOP just going to miss this board to much?
It’s mostly because of the wide OOP calling range, including off suit hands that miss and underpairs.
I really dig this format. I don’t know why but it seems like I soak up more info. It’s like live-streamed commentary, but more helpful.
Sooo dope! Been enjoying the triton cashgame episodes thanks for doing a review on them!
Big fan of this format
what happended to 98s in the llinus jungleman opening ranges?
It's not in there ;)
Fishes xD
jungleman even said himself in the video that he misscounted stackssizes in the 55 hand and should've folded pre -> which then tilted him even more
That makes sense, I did not know that.
Hi Teunuss,
On the openning hand of the video, why did you allow solver to use only 1 size for the flop ?
I thought it would be more relevant to use the size that was used by the player, I’m not sure if he will have a split range otf here.
Nice vid!
Please don't cut the pot size from the original video next time!
Was not intentional of course, probably a mistake on my end!
fantastic video teunuss!
Great video, teunuss , and excellent decision sticking to more interesting hands that can be productively analyzed, as opposed to just picking the biggest or most exciting ones. That last hand was especially interesting. Do you know anything more about when we might want to continue betting our paired hand when the turn brings an overcard? I understand the concept that if it is really good for our range we can bet it nearly 100%, similar to why we can cbet some boards near 100%, but I am really curious now about how often this type of situation occurs and how often I am blindly checking back my middle pair because I don't yet know how to think properly. Any insight or advice you may have is much appreciated.
Thanks, teunuss!
Thanks!
Try to estimate in these situations: In which line will our EV be the highest?
It can be possible that checking is very good, when you expect villain to overbluff the river.
Betting can be good in a situation like the A9 hand of llinus, where villains range is mostly pair+draw and pure high equity draws, where we can easily bet/call it off vs an agressive opponent, whether against a more passive opponent who isn't bluffing much on the river and not check shoving much on the turn bet/fold is the best play.
Hope this style of thinking helps a bit ;)
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.