$200 Regular Tables: Pinpointing Ranges
Posted by Tariq Haji
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 10 Comments...
The 33 hand, what do we do with the other parts of our range? For myself I would basically range 33% the river as our range improves soooo much on this runout and we also lack obvious bluffs. We have all the trips 7 that we semi-bluff the flop and turn, all the straights, flushes and boats and our opponents mostly just have OPs and some flushes. Theoretically our opponents cannot do much even if they know we are range 33% the river? I don't even think he can value jam many flushes on the river? If the jams the river we can just fold our bluffs, trips 7, and mix calls with straights and pure call flushes and better?
From an exploitative standpoint, what would you do if you have the other parts of your range? I assume 1. jamming with bluffs to fold out all his OPs. 2. 33% with trips 7, straights, flushes and boats with the intention to always fold trips 7 to jam, mix call with straights and call with flushes and boats (Assuming villains always value jam flushes).
If we assume pool is going to fold most OPs on the river vs a jam, I don't see many exploitative plays we can make here on the river as our range is actually value heavy in this spot. We can only bet small and hope for a crying call? If I am villain and I face this action and runout, I may even fold OPs even vs a 33% bet lol. It is easy to overbluff with the 33% size but also it is also difficult to overbluff the river given the runout and ranges?
I completely agree re the 33 hand; I think my river jam is not great I just run out of bluffs very quickly and should size down accordingly.
Exploitively as you said; if I did somehow have a bluff with a heart in it I would just always jam because I think jams here get folds almost every time
Great video!
9:45 table 4 you folded ajo to utg open. Will you add this hand into a 3bet bluff rng at some freq?
20:40 table 1 if opponent was deeper are you defending 77?
Thanks.
Regarding the AJo; it's actually just a pure fold for myself; I'm not 3 betting any offsuit hands here except AQ+!; Would much rather 3bet suited hands as they perform much better postflop.
For the 77; yes if we had my stack depth I would be pure calling pre
42:51 at the river: I just had to deal with this spot against a weaker player where I fold against overbet jam with nut flush at the river on paired board (25NL). but I even think that I would consider folding against most of the regs
I saw you open fold A6o on bttn twice with no action ahead. If you're not opening this, then what does your bttn range look like? If you're dropping hands due to regs in blinds, seems like dropping stuff like Q8o before A6o would be a good idea for the blocker properties.
I value the playability a tad more and found that over a large sample I was losing with A6o so I just cut it out completely
Tariq Haji that's super interesting. I mean if you have the data then by all means.
A large sample size can still have deviations, but yeah, hard to justify playing hands when you have clear evidence that they are losing you money.
Cutting it out seems reasonable, but also, it could be your postflop decisions that are affecting that specific combo. Like the way you are perceiving that specific hand class postflop, either playing too aggressively or passively in certain situations will of course have an impact.
Either way, respect you a lot as a player, so I don't take that adjustment lightly. Will encourage me to look in my own database for things like this that may be unintuitive.
Hey tariq great video why did we fold KTo to a limp on SB and didnt ISo it? at 9:59?
SB limp? I think you may have mis-saw the action. I'm seeing a UTG raise and btn call. Can you clarify?
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.