Super Sized Sunday (part 1)
Posted by Dylan Linde
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 5 Comments...
Nice vid man!
32:30- when u donk turn on the 8 pairing , its something that some mtteers are doing now and i guess they learned from cash players. I think that most cash players have a more selective and polar cbet tendencie so that probe bet makes more sense in that environment. Here , villain had 100% cbet , so doesnt this play make less sense ? I think with your actual hand this play was great , but as an overall game plan , i think this play shouldnt work as much against players who close their eyes and throw a 1/3 bet on every flop .
Thanks Andre :)
To the hand in question I think that vs someone with a huge cbetting range this play is also quite effective. If he is cbetting all his hands then my hand must be stronger than his on average on this sort of turn, one that has no real chance of improving his air cbets. Since my hand has no real showdown value it's better to get his hands with decent equity to fold here.
Hey Dylan - thanx for the vid - at around 8:27 your stack bumped from bout 60K to 78K - what did I miss?
Hmm I'm on my phone right now, I'll try to see what hand I missed
34:23 don't you think that the FE on mini raising 62o is too low and it increases in a non linear fashion when we decide to 2.5x this hand ? 3x I think it is bad since it creates enough dead money with FE on this trashy hand but 2.5x I think fits more on balancing the proper FE and a range that very good board coverage. I think that we are on the very bottom of our range to check there.
41:40 what you think about the call with 55s ? If I am not wrong, this is superkid-bam on stars and I rather fold 55s and call 77+ there but without the payout structure I can not talk much about ICM but if we are shoving 66+,AJs+,AQo+,KQ 55s is +0.1bb cEV. I don't think that is good enough to call, since this programs make mathematical approximations and this could easily be like -0.1 cEV and also by ICM considerations.
Very tough tables, bunch of great players. Good video and waiting for the next part.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.