Small Edges (part 2)
Posted by Leszek Badurowicz
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 8 Comments...
First hand:
T high straight is included in range B in RD, since you have cumulative on, and 56+ will show all 2pairs or better not listed in range A.
Good point, thx!
Hey, great series.
At 25:30 when analising hand on AJ6r board, when you had AAxx vs AJxx in PJ, you forgot to set villain hand to AJxx. It would reduce combo frequency of your nutted hands. The conclusion might be the same but still, blocking AJ makes a big difference.
Yes you're right, his equity will be 15%, and the conclusion will remain the same, he can't be bet/calling in this spot ;-)
At 12:15 you set Mathipeluri's check-raise range to include J:RR. Is this a common assumption you would make in these games or player specific? I wouldn't assume most players to be check-raising a hand like AQJ or AKJ here.
These are c/rasies for bluff so e.g. a hand like J993 that has some relevant blockers but in general is too weak to c/call. Imo hands with a J and a pair are very good candidates for c/r bluffs, but this assumption doesnt really affect the final conclusions.
Ok, thanks for elaborating, I see my mistake now. I usually don't use that notation for some reason. I would have written JOO or J:OO, which is the same as JRR. I usually only use $R which is a macro for a broadway card, that's why I thought you were writing J[A-T][A-T].
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.