More exploitative. My pool analysis shows that EP underfolds. So I 3bet a bigger size with a strong range. They don't adjust to the sizing anyway. If that leak didn't exist I would go smaller.
9:25 - in wizard sim BB is pure continuing all BWs vs b75 delay cbet OTT. Do you think the pool will have stronger delay cbet range compared to equilibrium so that we can start folding our KJo there?
I think pool cbets too much and their checking range improves a lot on the A compared to solutions. So the difference is in the flop cbet, making the A turn different.
You can actually fast fold the bb in ggpoker fwiw. If the pot is limped it just auto check/folds every street for you. P. S. Enjoying your videos, good job ��
At 6:54, curious why you chose to c-bet small (30%) on the 452ss board? I would expect that we c-bet less often on this flop given our range vs. a BB caller (and by c-betting, would get check raised more often); when we do want to bet, such as with an overpair with a spade as you did here, I would expect us to bet bigger to get more value from a drawing hand. A smaller c-bet also opens us up to lighter check raises, which I'm not sure our hand appreciates. Any thoughts would be very helpful.
BB is generally percieved as underbluffed. IP 4bets are underbluffed.
If you look at a solver, it likely calls A3s. At 50NL, their 4bet range is much stronger and so A3s becomes worse.
Loading 11 Comments...
Hey shaun i enjoy this format. Also like lower stakes videos.
At 2:18 3bet TT from button vs utg 2.2 open. You 3x to 7.5. Is that due to rake or would you do the same at NL200?
Thanks in advance!
More exploitative. My pool analysis shows that EP underfolds. So I 3bet a bigger size with a strong range. They don't adjust to the sizing anyway. If that leak didn't exist I would go smaller.
Nice one - would you consider doing some NL200 session in the future to compare across?
9:25 - in wizard sim BB is pure continuing all BWs vs b75 delay cbet OTT. Do you think the pool will have stronger delay cbet range compared to equilibrium so that we can start folding our KJo there?
I think pool cbets too much and their checking range improves a lot on the A compared to solutions. So the difference is in the flop cbet, making the A turn different.
You can actually fast fold the bb in ggpoker fwiw. If the pot is limped it just auto check/folds every street for you. P. S. Enjoying your videos, good job ��
At 6:54, curious why you chose to c-bet small (30%) on the 452ss board? I would expect that we c-bet less often on this flop given our range vs. a BB caller (and by c-betting, would get check raised more often); when we do want to bet, such as with an overpair with a spade as you did here, I would expect us to bet bigger to get more value from a drawing hand. A smaller c-bet also opens us up to lighter check raises, which I'm not sure our hand appreciates. Any thoughts would be very helpful.
Quote should be from Easy Game (Balugawhale) ��
3:24 I think a3s is standard call. why you think a3s is easy fold?
BB is generally percieved as underbluffed. IP 4bets are underbluffed.
If you look at a solver, it likely calls A3s. At 50NL, their 4bet range is much stronger and so A3s becomes worse.
Got it. i play 100nl-200nl do you think it is ok to call A3s?
thanks to reply !
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.