Wednesday MTT Live Session (part 2)

Posted by Paul Senter

You’re watching:

Wednesday MTT Live Session (part 2)

Paul Senter

Essential Pro

Video Player is loading.

Current Time 0:00

Loaded: 0%

Duration -:-

Remaining Time 0:00

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

To finish watching this video in its entirety either log in or sign up.

Log In Sign Up

10

8 Comments

Loading 8 Comments...

David M 12 years ago

nice stuff, paul! i would like to see a live session from some sunday GTD if thats possible

GregGT 12 years ago

Hi, Paul. It s slightly hard for me to watch 5 tables, at least at this table sizes. Stack sizes and stats are too shallow.
4 tables recording like Espen makes is pretty more comfortable for perception imo. May be its better to keep constantly 4 tables in focus and just bring up additional table with interesting hand into recording area and then remove it.

GregGT 12 years ago

Or option #2: keep 5-6 tables, but try to enlarge tables, even if they overlap each other slightly more, cause it s not so necessary to see all the tables at the same moment.

1sickstory 12 years ago

hey Paul, agreed with Greg, it's pretty cool to have as much action as possible, but tiny table size makes it hard to follow the whole thing. 4 tables (max 6?!) + some tables aside and popping up whenever there's an interesting spot looks better to me. +1 on bigger tables overlapping each others, that's sth we don't usually see but is very acceptable when watching a vid.
btw run better in turbos ;)

Paul Senter 12 years ago

Hi guys. Will try and make the next live series a bit easier to watch. Not sure if i'll bring tables in yet or focus on fewer. Apologies if this is hard to see all the figures. David I tried to record the end of my sunday yesterday but was single tabling pretty quickly =). Will try again next week..

klondike 11 years, 11 months ago

Like the others i would also prefer less tables. because its very hard to follow to many tables and seing stack, pot, and bet sizes becomes a litle hard. Also with less tables there are more time to explain thought process in each spot rather than risking to much becomes auto pilot.

Also about 5 minutes in. Im not sure i understod why you think 99 vs EP limp AI and 2 overlimp callers was close between call/push ?

Maybe you could explain it a litle more please :-)

As from my point of view it is pretty much a no brainer push againts relatively unknown players ( I can maybe understand that flat is ok if we know one of the overlimpers is often flatting big hands). EP limpers range can be all sorts of stuff you dominate + some hands we flip againts but will all the dead money there i cant understand why you would ever want to flat a hand that is as voulnerable as 99 is 4 way OOP ?

Paul Senter 11 years, 11 months ago

Hi Klondike. Sorry for the delayed response. The decision I had with 99 was more based on giving a shorty a chance at 5xing up and if it would be better to bust him. Also by letting limps see a flop which aren't likely to run a big bluff with an all in, we could get some more value by just checking here. I agree tho, I think the cleanest way to play it is just to jam.
Have just seen my new live part series has started and has 6 tables again, apologies for that, but hope its clear enough to watch.

eric eric 11 years, 10 months ago

this isn't live... why is it labeled live?

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience.